Is there any formula, of monadic second-order logic, that is only satisfied by an infinite set?
2026-03-26 02:56:01.1774493761
Is there any formula of monadic second-order logic that is only satisfied by an infinite set?
357 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LOGIC
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Determine the truth value and validity of the propositions given
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Symbol for assignment of a truth-value?
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- Do I need the axiom of choice to prove this statement?
- Prove that any truth function $f$ can be represented by a formula $φ$ in cnf by negating a formula in dnf
Related Questions in HIGHER-ORDER-LOGIC
- Finite axiomatizability of theories in infinitary logic?
- How do we get the converse of extensionality in Gödel's 1931 system?
- 'Logically symmetric' expressions in lambda calculus
- Paradox vs Tautology.
- If Type Theories are all Logics.
- Understanding The First Axiom Of Gödel's Ontological Proof
- Atomic Formulas in Second Order Logic
- Is many sorted logic really a unifying logic?
- Is this kind of high order logic of individual predicates inconsistent?
- Weak second order Logic
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Skolem proved a quantifier elimination result for Peirce's "Calculus of Classes". See this article in the Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy for some references. This calculus amounts to the first-order theory over the signature $(\subseteq; \emptyset, -, \cup, \cap)$ of type $(2; 0, 1, 2, 2)$ whose intended interpretation is the set of subsets of some universe with $\subseteq$ being the subset relation,with $\emptyset$ denoting the empty set and with $-$, $\cup$ and $\cap$ denoting complementation, union and intersection.
Skolem's result shows that every sentence is equivalent to a propositional combination of sentences $L_n$ ($n = 1, 2, \ldots)$, where $L_n$ means "the universe has at least $n$ elements". Monadic second order logic can be reduced to the theory of the Calculus of Classes by mapping sets to themselves and by treating elements as singleton sets, noting that singleton sets are the atoms for the subset relation. A satisfiable propositional combination of the sentences $L_n$ is satisfiable in a finite universe, hence a satisfiable sentence of the form $\exists x.\phi$ is satisfiable with a witness for $x$ that is finite.