Is there any "good" definition for what constitutes "applied mathematics"?
Wikipedia lists stuff such as statistics, optimization. However, e.g these have certainly "pure mathematical" aspects to them. So what makes them "applied mathematics"?
Or what would make "pure mathematics" not "applied mathematics"? Is the distinction arbitrary (e.g. because even if something initially seems like it doesn't have applications, then it could be, that we just haven't seem them yet)?
Based on this I'd say the distinction is arbitrary. Rather, there's just mathematics and applications of mathematics.
My school had different course grouping numbers for pure and applied mathematics, but we were explicitly told that the grouping was meaningless and was only there because it was there historically. Pure math was $640$ and applied math was $642$.
I mostly took $640$ courses, but I did take one $642$ course and it could hardly have been called "applied" in the sense of it being useful in science or industry. It was just an ordinary graduate level combinatorics course.
That said, there can be a meaningful distinction between the two, and using the term "arbitrary" suggests to me that the distinction is not meaningful. My research is not applied math, and mathematical physics is. Between them, one can use discretion, but those are two things I know.