Is: $\exists x (P(x) \land Q(x)) \rightarrow \exists x P(x) \land \exists x Q(x) $ logically valid?.
I cant found an intepretation in wich the formula is false.
Is: $\exists x (P(x) \land Q(x)) \rightarrow \exists x P(x) \land \exists x Q(x) $ logically valid?.
I cant found an intepretation in wich the formula is false.
Yes, indeed it is valid. No counterexample to be found.
If there exists an $x$ for which both ($P(x)$ and $Q(x)$) hold, then there certainly exists an $x$ for which $P(x)$ holds, and there exists an $x$ for which $Q(x)$ holds.
The converse implication is not valid, however. If there exists an $x$ that's a pumpkin and there exists an $x$ that is green, it does not follow that there exists an $x$ that is a green pumpkin.