Let $B_n(K)$ be an upper triangular matrices, which is a standard Borel subgroup of $GL_n(K)$. $K$ is an algebraically closed field. So this is a parabolic subgroup of $GL_n(K)$. I was wondering is $B_n(K)$ a maximal proper parabolic subgroup? If not what is the maximal proper parabolic subgroup containing $B_n(K)$? thank you.
2026-03-25 20:34:16.1774470856
Is upper triangular matrices maximal parabolic subgroup?
464 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GROUPS
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- How to realize the character group as a Lie/algebraic/topological group?
- Action of Unipotent algebraic group
- From a compact topological group to a commutative Hopf algebra
- When do we have $C(G) \otimes C(G) =C(G\times G)?$
- What is the internal Hom object in the category $\mathcal{C} = \mathbf{Rep}_k(G)$?
- Is the product of simply connected algebraic groups simply connected?
- Connected subgroup of $(K^\times)^n$ of Zariski dimension 1
- Action of $ \mathbb{G}_m $ on $ \mathbb{A}^n $ by multiplication.
- Book recommendation for Hopf algebras
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The conjugacy classes of parabolic subgroups correspond to partitions of $n$, in the following way: For the partition $\lambda$ given by $n=n_1+\cdots+n_k$, one can attach the parabolic subgroup $$P_\lambda:=\begin{pmatrix}\mathrm{GL}_{n_1}(K)&*&*\\ &\mathrm{GL}_{n_2}(K)&\\ 0&0&&\ddots\\ 0&\dots&0&&\mathrm{GL}_{n_k}(K)\end{pmatrix}.$$ In particular, the trivial partition corresponds to $P_{(n)}=\mathrm{GL}_n(K)$ and $n=1+\cdots+1$ gives rise to the Borel subgroup: $P_{(n=1+\cdots+1)}=B$.
Now, refinements of partitions $\lambda\le\mu$ (e.g, $(2=2)<(2=1+1)$) exactly corresponds to inclusions $P_\lambda\supset P_\mu$. Thus, what you want are the nontrivial partitions of $n$ which is not the refinement of any other nontrivial partitions (i.e., the minimal elements in the lattice of partitions of $n$ with respect to refinement, minus the trivial partition $n=n$.) These are exactly the partitions $n=n_1+n_2$.
In particular, there is no unique proper maximal parabolic subgroup (for $n>3$)!