Isolated Versus Non-Isolated Fixed Point, 2D Dynamics

10.8k Views Asked by At

I am trying to understand the classification of fixed points in a dynamical systems context (fixed points of a system of two linear differential equations are places where both $x_1' = x_2' = 0$).

Representing 2D systems as a matrix equation $\vec x'=\matrix A\vec x$, Strogatz classifies fixed points based on $\tau$, the trace of the matrix and $\Delta$, the determinant of the matrix:

  • unstable node:                                                 $\tau>\sqrt{4\Delta}$,      $\Delta>0$
  • unstable spiral (spiral source):    $\sqrt{4\Delta}>\tau>0$,              $\Delta>0$
  • neutrally stable centers:                                $\tau=0$,              $\Delta>0$
  • stable spiral (spiral sink):          $-\sqrt{4\Delta}<\tau<0$,             $\Delta>0$
  • stable node:                                                      $\tau<-\sqrt{4\Delta}$,  $\Delta>0$
  • saddle point:                                                                              $\Delta<0$

However, he is very vague about the boundary cases. Specifically, what happens on the parabola $\tau^2-4\Delta=0$ and the line $\Delta=0$?

Strogatz mentions that these include star nodes (decoupled systems), degenerate nodes (one unique eigendirection), and nonisolating fixed points. However, in a later problem, he mentions "isolating fixed points". What is the difference?

How are all of these nonstandard edge cases classified in terms of $\tau$ and $\Delta$?