If $R$ is a ring and $I\subseteq R$ is an ideal, I want to see why $$\textrm{Hom}_R(I, R/I) \cong \textrm{Hom}_R(I/I^2, R/I)$$ I read somewhere that this is true because of the action of any element in $I$. I'm having difficulty seeing what this means explicitly. Can someone spell it out?
2026-04-08 03:49:08.1775620148
Isomorphism of Hom sets
233 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
$\DeclareMathOperator{\Hom}{Hom}$ Sure. If an $R$-linear map $\alpha : M \rightarrow P$ kills a submodule $N$ of $M$, then there is a unique $\beta : M/N \rightarrow P$ such that $\beta \circ \pi = \alpha$, where $\pi : M \rightarrow M/N$ is the projection map.
Define a map $\Phi : \Hom_R (I, R/I ) \rightarrow \Hom_R (I / I^2, R / I)$ where $\phi : I \rightarrow R/I$ is sent to the unique $\psi : I / I^2 \rightarrow R / I$ such that $\psi \circ \pi = \phi$, where $\pi : I \rightarrow I/I^2$ is the canonical projection map. Note that $\phi : I \rightarrow R /I$ must indeed kill $I^2$ since $\phi(xy) = x\phi(y) =0$ for $x, y \in I$.
There is also a map $\Psi : \Hom_R (I / I^2, R / I) \rightarrow \Hom_R ( I, R/I)$, where $\phi \mapsto \phi \circ \pi$.
All that's left is to show the two maps are inverse to each other. I'll elaborate on this point upon request.