Are there any good pictures or applets representing how Jacobi fields depend on their initial vectors? The textbook I'm using told me that solutions exist based on ODE theory, but I'm not sure how to visualise them.
2026-03-25 12:12:11.1774440731
Jacobi field visualisation
190 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in TANGENT-BUNDLE
- Equivalent definition of vector field over $S^2$
- What is the significance of having a tangent bundle that splits into the direct sum of line bundles?
- Computing the flow on the cotangent bundle
- Different definitions of derivation at a point
- Tangent bundle of a product diffeom. to the product of tangent bundle.
- tangent subbundle which is not a distribtuion
- Derivative of vector field on a surface
- Vector field on a smooth variety
- Tangent vector defined in two ways?
- Nijenhuis tensor in local coordinates
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There's a nice picture in John M. Lee's Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature (https://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~v1ranick/papers/leeriemm.pdf), Figure 10.4. Lee states that the set of Jacobi fields along a geodesic is a $2n$-dimensional linear space (Corollary 10.5), with 2 tangential dimensions and $2n-2$ normal dimensions. These correspond to independent, arbitrary choices of $J(0) \in T_p (M)$ and $D_t J(0) \in T_p M$. It seems like tangential components are "trivial", i.e. you get a reparametrisation of the same geodesic.
In all the normal directions, the the simple thing you can do is "rotate the geodesic in that direction" (see Lemmas 10.7 and 10.8, as well as the figure). I haven't found a good picture or description of the other direction, but I suspect you can essentially "move the geodesic in space" in that direction. If you're on a sphere, rotating the geodesic would give you a conjugate point at distance $\pi$, while moving the geodesic would give you a conjugate point at distance $\frac{\pi}{2}$.