Wikipedia on the Jordan-Chevalley decomposition (on endomorphisms) says that an analogous decomposition exists in Lie algebras, but no specifics or sources are given. I'm learning about Lie algebras, I don't care about the specifics of how this decomposition is done, but I have this result here that says that for semisimple Lie algebras, if $x=x_s+x_n$ is the Jordan decomposition, that this is consistent with the Jordan decomposition of any representation, i.e. $R(x_s)=R(x)_s$ and $R(x_n)=R(x)_n$. I don't understand what the Jordan decomposition in Lie algebra means. For an operator it's obvious, but Lie algebras are vector spaces, and I don't understand what it means to do a Jordan decomposition on some element $x$ of a Lie algebra. My best guess is that we define some linear map, like the adjoint map $[x,y]$. This seems logical because this is an endomorphism, but I don't know if this is right. (Update: Actually the adjoint map is a derivation, not homomorphism, so it's certainly not this.)
2026-04-13 04:25:20.1776054320
Jordan-Chevalley decomposition of Lie algebra elements
92 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Assuming unitarity of arbitrary representations in proof of Schur's lemma
- Are representation isomorphisms of permutation representations necessarily permutation matrices?
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Help with a definition in Serre's Linear Representations of Finite Groups
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Properties of symmetric and alternating characters
- Representation theory of $S_3$
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
For semisimple Lie algebras over $\mathbb{C}$, the Jordan decomposition is done in the following way:
Let $\mathfrak{g}$ be a (finite-dimensional) semisimple Lie algebra (over $\mathbb{C}$), and $\operatorname{ad}\colon \mathfrak{g}\to\mathfrak{gl}(\mathfrak{g})$ the adjoint representation. Then the image of $\operatorname{ad}$ is a semisimple subalgebra of $\mathfrak{gl}(\mathfrak{g})$. Note that a semisimple subalgebra $\mathfrak{h}\subseteq \mathfrak{g}$ satisfies the following property: given any $x\in\mathfrak{h}$ (which is a linear operator), the usual Jordan decomposition $x=x_{s}+x_{n}$ satisfies that $x_{s},x_{n}\in\mathfrak{h}$.
Now, let $x\in\mathfrak{g}$. Then we can consider $\operatorname{ad}(x)\in\mathfrak{h}$, and take the Jordan decomposition $\operatorname{ad}(x)=(\operatorname{ad}(x))_{s}+(\operatorname{ad}(x))_{n}$. Since $\operatorname{ad}(\mathfrak{g})$ is semisimple, and $\operatorname{ad}$ is an injective linear map, it follows that there exist unique elements $y,z\in\mathfrak{g}$ such that $\operatorname{ad}(y)=(\operatorname{ad}(x))_{s}$ and $\operatorname{ad}(z)=(\operatorname{ad}(x))_{n}$. Simply define $x_{s}=y$ and $x_{n}=z$. The decomposition $x=x_{s}+x_{n}$ is called the abstract Jordan decomposition of $x$, and one can show that for any representation $\rho\colon\mathfrak{g}\to\mathfrak{gl}(V)$, the decomposition $\rho(x)=\rho(x_{s})+\rho(x_{n})$ is precisely the Jordan decomposition of the linear map $\rho(x)$.
For proofs and more details, you can check Humphreys, Introduction to Lie algebras and Representation Theory.
Hope this helps!