I am studying Riemann integral, and I haven't understood what is the relation between the concepts of Riemann integral and Jordan measure. Is Riemann integral a special case of Jordan Measure? What is the precise definition of Jordan Measure? Thank so much to who will help me!
2026-04-19 12:27:24.1776601644
Jordan measure and Riemann integral
2.3k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in ANALYSIS
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Show that $d:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\rightarrow[0,\infty[$ is a metric on $\mathbb{C}$.
- conformal mapping and rational function
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- How to prove that $E_P(\frac{dQ}{dP}|\mathcal{G})$ is not equal to $0$
- Integral of ratio of polynomial
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Recall that for a bounded subset $A$ of $\mathbb{R}^d$, we define the Jordan upper approximation by:
$$J^{R_n}(A) = \sum_{R_n \cap A} \mathrm{Vol}(R_n)$$
Here the indexing is over all rectangles that intersect $A$, where $R_n$ is a finite set of $d$-dimensional rectangles that cover $A$. We can see why this is called the upper approximation: you cover your set with things that may have more mass than it. You get extra mass, but you don't miss any either. Finally, to find the upper approximation of this, you take a limit by taking smaller and smaller covers, i.e we define:
$$ J^* (A) = \inf\{J^{R_n}(A) : R_n \text{ is a finite rectangle cover of $A$}\} $$ Similarly, we define lower approximations by: $$ J_{R_n}(A) = \sum_{R_n \subset A} \mathrm{Vol}(R_n) $$ Here, each rectangle is a subset. So now we are measuring the size from the inside, and hence the true size should be what we get when we take successively larger volumes, i.e:
$$ J_* (A) = \sup\{J_{R_n}(A) : R_n \subset A\} $$
The Jordan measure is defined when: $$ J^* (A) = \inf\{J^{R_n}(A) : \{R_n\}_{n=1}^{N} \text{ is a finite rectangle cover of $A$}\} = J_* (A) = \sup\{J_{R_n}(A) : \{R_n\}_{n=1}^{N}\subset \mathcal{P}(A), \text{i.e. each } R_n \subset A\} $$ i.e when the lower approximations converge to the same limit as the upper ones. Let's try now and see how we could calculate the volume of a set $A$ through integration.
Define the indicator function of a set $\mathbf{1}_A$ as: $$ \mathbf{1}_A = \begin{cases}1 & x\in A \\ 0 & x \not \in A \end{cases} $$ This function "indicates" when a point is in a set or not. Hence, a natural definition for the volume of a set in terms of integration is: $$ \mathrm{vol}(A) = \int_{R} \mathbf{1}_A(x) \mathrm{d} x $$ where $R$ is a rectangle that contains $A$ (as $A$ is bounded). This is true provided the integral converges. Let's show now that if $A$ is jordan measurable, then this integral converges and its value is whatever the jordan measure of $A$ is. First, lets take the upper and lower sums of the integral. Recall that the upper sums for a partition $P$ of our domain $R$ and our function $\mathbf{1}_A$ (cutting $R$ up into smaller rectangles) is given by: $$ U(\mathbf{1}_A, P) = \sum_{n} \sup_{x \in R_n} \mathbf{1}_A (x)\mathrm{Vol}(R_n) $$ The lower sums are given by: $$ L(\mathbf{1}_A, P) = \sum_{n} \inf_{x \in R_n} \mathbf{1}_A (x)\mathrm{Vol}(R_n) $$ Note that by the definition of our function $\mathbf{1}_A$, a couple things can happen. If for a rectangle $R_n$ in our partition, we have that $R_n \subset A$, then $\inf_{x \in R_n} \mathbf{1}_A = 1$, because every point in $R_n$ is in $A$ and so the indicator function is $1$ everywhere. Similarly, if we see that one of our rectangles $R_n$ intersects $A$, then $\sup_{x \in R_n} \mathbf{1}_A(x) = 1$, as the maximum value is $1$ and it is attained. Hence, we can rewrite the Riemann sums as follows: $$U(\mathbf{1}_A, P) = \sum_{R_n \cap A}\mathrm{Vol}(R_n) = J^{R_n}(A)$$ And similarly for the lower sums:
$$ L(\mathbf{1}_A, P) = \sum_{R_n \subset A}\mathrm{Vol}(R_n) = J_{R_n}(A) $$ So the, upper and lower Riemann sums of the integral of the indicator function of $A$ are the upper and lower Jordan sums! And hence we see that the inf of the upper Riemann sums exists, because it is the inf of the upper Riemann sums, and similarly for the lower Riemann sums. Hence, the jordan content of the set is the Riemann integral of the indicator function of that set!
This was a bit of a long explanation so please let me know if anything needs clarification.