The Lie theory 'killing form' feels very similar to just being the character of the adjoint representation, of course taking two inputs rather than one. How do these relate?
2026-04-09 01:26:02.1775697962
Killing form in relation to character of adjoint representation
458 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Assuming unitarity of arbitrary representations in proof of Schur's lemma
- Are representation isomorphisms of permutation representations necessarily permutation matrices?
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Help with a definition in Serre's Linear Representations of Finite Groups
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Properties of symmetric and alternating characters
- Representation theory of $S_3$
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
First note that, while group characters are defined as $\chi_\rho(s) = \mathrm{Tr}(\rho_s)$ for some representation $\rho$ and group element $s$, Lie algebra characters are defined slightly differently. For some representaiton $\theta: \mathfrak g \to \mathfrak{gl}(V)$ of some Lie algebra $\mathfrak g$ (can be assumed to be semisimple for simplicity here), a character $\chi_\theta$ is defined as a function over the Cartan subalgebra $\mathfrak h$ of $\mathfrak g$ in a way that for any element $h \in \mathfrak h$ you get $\chi_\theta(h) = \mathrm{Tr} e^{\theta(h)}$. So essentially they end up being the trace of the metrix representative of the Lie group element $\mathrm{exp}(h) \in \mathrm{GL}(V)$. (c.f. [Wiki]).
So, the similarity that you mentioned is less prominent, since the algebraic character evaluates to a trace of a group element and the Killing form uses trace of the matrix product of the matrix representatives of two algebra elemetns. Also note that for any two element $a, b \in \mathfrak g$ the Killing form evaluates $\mathrm{Tr}(\theta(a) \circ \theta(b))$ where $\theta$ is the adjoint representation, and $\rho(a) \circ \rho(b)$ is not a representative of any algebra element, so the trace is over something that doesn't belong to the algebra. The sole purpose of the Killing form is to give you an (extremely useful) inner product for the Lie algebra that doesn't require any extrinsic representation theoretic data (the data defining the adjoint representation is equivalent to the data defining the Lie algebra, you don't need anything extra, so use of the adjoint representation is acceptable here). The prupose of the characters, on the other hand, is to encode data that characterizes various representations. For example, the data of the characters of semi simple complex Lie algebras are equivalent to the data defining their finite dimensional representations (c.f. [Ser]:Chapter VII, Proposition 5). Thus, conceptually the Killing form and the characters are essentially different objects.