I am studying control systems, and my textbook uses "Lagrange's formula" for solving time-continuous linear systems in "state-space". Below are the equations presented:
$$\dot{x}(t) = Ax(t) + Bu(t)$$
$$y(t) = Cx(t) + Du(t)$$
where A,B,C and D are matrices of coefficients, but let's assume they are all singular to make things simpler.
Assuming that $t > t_0$ and $x(t_0) = x_{t_0}$,the formula used to calculate $x(t)$ is the following:
$$x(t) = e^{A(t-t_0)}x_{t_0} + \int_{t_0}^t e^{A(t-\tau)}Bu(\tau) d\tau $$
This formula is very similar to another formula I learned in calc 2 for an identical purpose, albeit this next formula is defined for all values of t and contains an indefinite integral in place of the definite integral in the formula above
$$ x(t) = e^{-At} \int Bu(t)e^{At} dt $$
It is obvious to me that these formulas are strongly connected, but whereas I understand how the second one is derived, I cannot say the same about the first one. And what is up with using $\tau$ as the variable for intergration? I've been told it is a "dummy variable", but it was presented as a fact, rather than a proven result of calculus.
I've also tried to google this so-called "Lagrange formula", but unfortunately I haven't had any success with it. Can anybody please help me understand this?
It is simply notation. The indefinite integral is computed using the anti-derivative: $$ \int f(t) \, dt = F(t) + C $$ where $F'(t) = f(t)$, and $C$ is a constant. Then the definite integral is $$ \int_a^b f(t) \, dt = F(b) - F(a) .$$ In this second equation, the $t$ is a 'dummy variable.' I could just as well write $$ \int_a^b f(\tau) \, d\tau = F(b) - F(a) .$$ In particular, to avoid confusion, we make sure that the dummy variable is not the same as the variables we use in the limits (or anywhere else). So if I want to write $$ \int_{t_0}^t f(\tau) \, d\tau = F(t) - F(t_0) $$ it would be confusing if I used the letter $t$ as the dummy variable.
And look $$ \int f(t) \, dt = \int_{t_0}^t f(\tau) \, d\tau + C_1 $$ where $C_1 = C + F(t_0)$.
Finally, we have this formula: $$ g(t) \int f(t) \, dt = g(t) \left(\int_{t_0}^t f(\tau) \, d\tau + C_1\right) = \int_{t_0}^t g(t) f(\tau) \, d\tau + C_1 g(t) .$$ This last formula would be nonsense if we didn't change the dummy variable to something other than $t$.