Suppose we fix $0 < R_{0} < R$ and $f: \mathbb{R}^{3} \to \mathbb{R}$ is the solution of the Laplace equation $-\Delta f = 0$, in the annulus $|x| \in (R_{0},R]$. Suppose $f$ is radial. Is it true that $f$ is necessarily of the form $f(r) = A+br^{-1}$, with $r = |x|$? In other words, all smooth radial solutions of the Laplace equation inside this annulus are of this form?
2026-03-27 14:21:46.1774621306
Laplace equation in an annulus
97 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
Related Questions in HARMONIC-FUNCTIONS
- Harmonicity is a local property?
- Harmonic functions satisfying given inequality
- Is there Phragmen-Lindelof for $\mathbb{C}_+$ where $f$ is not bounded on $i\mathbb{R}$ but has polynomial growth?
- Solution of a non homogeneous Laplace equation on the unit disk.
- Complex Analysis - Harmonic function as real part of holomorphic function
- Show that u is harmonic
- Physicists construct their potentials starting from the Laplace equation, why they do not use another differential operator, like theta Θ?
- Prove a family of harmonic functions is locally bounded
- Why is $ u=\log(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})$ not harmonic for $x^2 + y^2 <1$?
- Modulus and argument of a holomorphic function.
Related Questions in LINEAR-PDE
- Solving the heat equation with robin boundary conditions
- The energy method for $u_{tt}-du_t-u_{xx}=0, (0,1)\times(0,T) $
- Motivation to define the boundary value
- 1-D Heat Equation, bounding difference in $\alpha$ given surface temperature
- Comparison principle for linear second order viscosity solutions
- Implications of weak convergence on the Lebesgue space to Sobolev space
- Geometric meaning of this PDE :$\left\{\begin{array}{lll} f_{t}+xf_{y}=0\\ f|_{t=0}=f_{0}(x,y) \end{array}\right.$
- Simple linear first order PDE
- how to solve a linear pde of changing evolution equation?
- How to solve a PDE with time dependent domain?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes.
The assumption that your solution is radial implies the boundary values on the inner ring are constant, likewise on the outer ring. So boundary values are determined up to two constants, and can be matched by appropriately setting the two constants $A$ and $b$ in $f(r) = A + br^{-1}$.
By the uniqueness of the Dirichlet problem, this is therefore the only solution.
Evans also proves this fact directly (and more generally in any dimension) in §2.2.1 of Partial Differential Equations. Adapted here:
Let $u:\mathbb{R}^n\to \mathbb{R}$ be a radial solution to $-\Delta u = 0$. That is, there exists a well-defined $v:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ where $u(x) = v(|x|)$. Letting $r = |x|$ we compute
$$\frac{\partial r}{\partial x_i} = \frac{1}{2}\left(x_1^2 + \cdots + x_n^2\right)^{-1/2}2x_i = \frac{x_i}{r} \qquad (x\not = 0)$$
Substituting this into the chain rule we get
$$u_{x_i} = v'(r)\frac{x_i}{r}.$$ Differentiating and substituting again gives
$$u_{x_ix_i} = v''(r)\frac{x_i^2}{r^2} + v'(r)\left(\frac{1}{r}- \frac{x_i^2}{r^3}\right).$$
Summing over $i$, the Laplace operator becomes $$\Delta u = v''(r) + \frac{n-1}{r} v'(r).$$ Applying the fact that $\Delta u = 0$ reduces this to the ODE
$$v'' + \frac{n-1}{r}v' = 0.$$
Whenever $v' \not = 0$ we can rewrite this as
$$\log (|v'|)' = \frac{v''}{v'} = \frac{1-n}{r}$$
which after integrating and simplifying is $$v'(r) = ar^{1-n},\qquad a\in \mathbb{R}.$$
Integrating once again then gives the general radial solution for $r>0$:
$$v(r) = \begin{cases}b\log r + A & \text{if $n=2$}\\ br^{2-n} + A & \text{if $n\geq 3$} \end{cases}$$