From three consecutive primes 89 results from $223*211mod199$=89. Is this the largest prime remainder? For p(n)=then nth prime, the form is p(n+1)*p(n+2)modp(n)=prime.
2026-04-02 07:03:51.1775113431
largest prime remainder from three consecutive primes
53 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PRIME-NUMBERS
- New prime number
- Confirmation of Proof: $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \ \pi (n) \geqslant \frac{\log n}{2\log 2}$
- How do I prove this question involving primes?
- What exactly is the definition of Carmichael numbers?
- I'm having a problem interpreting and starting this problem with primes.
- Decimal expansion of $\frac{1}{p}$: what is its period?
- Multiplying prime numbers
- Find the number of relatively prime numbers from $10$ to $100$
- A congruence with the Euler's totient function and sum of divisors function
- Squares of two coprime numbers
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
THIS IS NOT A COMPREHENSIVE ANSWER, rather an extended comment that is too long for the 'comment' section.
Consider three consecutive prime numbers $p_n,\ p_{n+1},\ p_{n+2}$ with gaps $g_1=p_{n+1}-p_n$ and $g_2=p_{n+2}-p_{n+1}$. For all $p_n>2$, $g_1$ and $g_2$ are even.
$p_{n+1}\equiv g_1\mod{p_n}$ and $p_{n+2}\equiv g_1+g_2\mod{p_n}$ so $(p_{n+1})(p_{n+2})\equiv (g_1)(g_1+g_2)\mod{p_n}$.
Unless $(g_1)(g_1+g_2)>p_n$, $(g_1)(g_1+g_2)\mod{p_n}$ will be even and hence composite (see comment by lulu). Thus as larger candidate $p_n$ are examined, it would be necessary to focus on primes separated by larger gaps.
The size of gaps is subject to limits. In general $g_1\le \alpha p_n$, or $p_{n+1}\le (1+\alpha )p_n$ and $p_{n+2}\le (1+\alpha )p_{n+1}=(1+\alpha )^2p_n\approx (1+2\alpha )p_n$. So $\max(g_1)=(1+\alpha )p_n-p_n=\alpha p_n$ and $\max((g_1+g_2))\approx(1+2\alpha )p_n-p_n=2\alpha p_n$.
Thus $\max((g_1)(g_1+g_2))\approx 2{\alpha}^2{p_n}^2$. For $(g_1)(g_1+g_2)>p_n$ it must be the case that $p_n>\frac{1}{2{\alpha}^2}$.
For numbers greater than $2\cdot 10^7$, Schoenfeld cited here has given a numerical limit $\alpha \le \frac{1}{16597}$ requiring $p_n>\frac{16597^2}{2}\approx1.3\cdot 10^8$. Other non-numeric limits on $\alpha$ are also given in the Wikipedia article, which may be even smaller than the value of Schoenfeld. Note that even if candidates with $(g_1)(g_1+g_2)>p_n$ are found, there is no guarantee that the residue generated will be prime. This suggests that very large primes (much greater than those examined by gammatester) will have to be examined in the search for a prime remainder larger than $89$.