I am studying the proof of the Prime Number Theorem and I want to show that the function $\frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)}$ has a simple pole at $s=1$.
I think that if I can find the Laurent series expansion of $\zeta(s)$, I could then find the same for $\frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)}$ and then conclude that it has a simple pole at $s=1$.(Correct me if I am wrong.)
But, how do I find the Laurent expansion ? I know that $\zeta(s)$ has a simple pole at $s=1$ but how can I use this to find the complete expansion ? Also, do I even need to find the complete expansion to show that $\frac{\zeta'(s)}{\zeta(s)}$ has a simple pole at $s=1$ ? Is there any other way ?
Please help. Any help/hint shall be highly appreciated.
If all one cares about is knowing that there is a simple pole at $s=1$ (and perhaps what its residue is), this can actually be done quite quickly using some standard complex-analytic results. For a reference, see these notes by Terry Tao, and in particular Exercise 14. By partial summation (or Euler-Maclaurin; they're essentially the same thing), we have
$$ \zeta(s) = \frac{1}{s-1} + s\int_{1}^{\infty} \frac{\left\{ x\right\}}{x^{s+1}} dx, $$ where $\left\{ x\right\}$ denotes the fractional part of $s$. The integral converges absolutely for $\Re s > 0$, and so has no poles in this region. Thus $\zeta(s)$ has a simple pole at $s=1$ with residue $1$.
For a meromorphic function $f$, the only poles of $f'/f$ are simple poles occuring at the poles and zeros of $f$. Thus $\zeta'(s)/\zeta(s)$ has a simple pole at $s=1$. In fact, the residue is the negative order of pole, so the residue at $s=1$ of $\zeta'(s)/\zeta(s)$ is $-1$.