I know that if $A$ is diagonalizable, it must be the zero matrix. I also know that diagonalizable matrices are dense in the set of complex matrices. I don't think that helps though. Any ideas on where to start?
2026-03-25 22:04:42.1774476282
Let $A$ be a complex matrix $n \times n$ matrix. Suppose that $e^{A} = I + A + A^{2}$. Prove or disprove: A is the zero matrix.
107 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
$A$ is not necessarily the zero matrix.
No shortage of such $A \ne 0$:
For suppose
$0 \ne A \in M_n(\Bbb C), \; n \ge 2, \tag 1$
but
$A^2 = 0; \tag 2$
there are plenty of such matrices; e.g., take
$A = [a_{ij}] \tag 3$
where
$a_{ij} = \delta_{i1} \delta_{jn}, \tag 4$
that is,
$a_{1n} = 1; \; a_{ij} = 0, i \ne 1 \; \text{or} \; j \ne n; \tag 5$
it is easy to see that
$A^2 = 0; \tag 6$
then for invertible
$P \in M_n(\Bbb C) \tag 7$
we also have
$P^{-1}AP \ne 0 \tag 8$
and
$(P^{-1}AP)^2 = P^{-1}APP^{-1}AP = P^{-1}A^2P = 0; \tag 9$
now for
$n \ge 2, \tag{10}$
$A^n = A^{n - 2}A^2 = 0, \tag{11}$
so
$e^A = \displaystyle \sum_0^\infty \dfrac{A^m}{m!} = I + A = I + A + A^2, \tag{11}$
by virtue of (10), (11). And, in the light of (9), the same holds for any $P^{-1}AP$ with invertible $P$.