Why does the author let $V_m = \bigcap_{k=m}^\infty H_k$? I think $V_m = H_m$ so there is no need to define $V_m$. Can we just use $H_m$ and let $H=\bigcup H_m$?
2026-03-31 12:21:34.1774959694
Let $|E|_e$ denote the outer measure of a set $E$ in $\mathbb R^n$. If $E_k \nearrow E$, then $\lim_{k\to \infty} |E_k|_e = |E|_e$.
67 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in PROOF-VERIFICATION
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Existence of a denumerble partition.
- Confirmation of Proof: $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \ \pi (n) \geqslant \frac{\log n}{2\log 2}$
- Calculating probabilities using Markov chains.
- Solution to a hard inequality
- Given a function, prove that it's injective
- Is the following set open/closed/compact in the metric space?
- Surjective function proof
- Possible Error in Dedekind Construction of Stillwell's Book
- Proving dual convex cone property
Related Questions in PROOF-EXPLANATION
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Lemma 1.8.2 - Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory
- Proof of Fourier transform of cos$2\pi ft$
- Total number of nodes in a full k-ary tree. Explanation
- Finding height of a $k$-ary tree
- How to get the missing brick of the proof $A \circ P_\sigma = P_\sigma \circ A$ using permutations?
- Inner Product Same for all Inputs
- Complex Derivatives in Polar Form
- Confused about how to prove a function is surjective/injective?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?

The point of taking the intersections $V_m = \bigcap_{k=m}^\infty H_k$ is so that the $V_m$ are increasing. Note that without any further assumptions, the $H_m$ are not necessarily increasing, even though they have the same outer measures as the $E_m$. Hence we do not necessarily have $H_m = V_m$. So we replace $H_m$ by the increasing sequence $V_m$ to apply Theorem 3.26.
Just as a simple example to see that the $H_m$ are not necessarily increasing, suppose that we are working in $\Bbb R$ and let $E_m = B_{1-1/m}(0)$, the ball of radius $1-1/m$ centered at $0$. Take $H_m = E_m\cup\{m\}$. Then clearly $H_m$ is measurable, and $|H_m| = |E_m|_e$, but $H_m\not\subset H_{m+1}$, so the sequence $H_m$ is not increasing. However, $V_m = E_m$ is increasing.