What is the easiest way to prove that $e^{-z} = \frac{1}{e^{z}}$ when $z = a + b*i$ where we assume a and b are real numbers.
2026-03-25 04:42:47.1774413767
Let $z = a + b*i$ where we assume a and b are real numbers. Prove $e^{-z} = \frac{1}{e^{z}}$
42 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPLEX-NUMBERS
- Value of an expression involving summation of a series of complex number
- Minimum value of a complex expression involving cube root of a unity
- orientation of circle in complex plane
- Locus corresponding to sum of two arguments in Argand diagram?
- Logarithmic function for complex numbers
- To find the Modulus of a complex number
- relation between arguments of two complex numbers
- Equality of two complex numbers with respect to argument
- Trouble computing $\int_0^\pi e^{ix} dx$
- Roots of a complex equation
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There are (at least) three options, depending on how you're defining $e^z$:
(1) If you define $e^{a + bi} = e^a (\cos b + i \sin b)$, then it follows just from algebraic manipulation and the corresponding real result.
(2) If you define $e^z = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{z^n}{n!}$, then the result follows with some more algebraic manipulation, probably along with some sort of result about uniform convergence on compact sets.
(3) A better definition is to take $e^z$ to be the unique solution of the differential equation $f' = f$ with $f(0) = 1$. Then for fixed $w$, the function $g(z) = e^{z + w} / e^w$ satisfies the same equation and boundary condition, so we have $e^{z + w} = e^z e^w$ everywhere. This approach requires results on the existence and uniqueness of certain differential equations, though.