In deriving the multivariable chain rule we can start with: $$\Delta u\approx \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} \Delta x +\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} \Delta y$$ and divide both sides by $\Delta t$ say to get: $$\frac{\Delta u}{\Delta t}\approx \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} \frac{\Delta x}{\Delta t}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} \frac{\Delta y}{\Delta t}$$ So here is my question: why when we let all the small quantities $\Delta a$ tend to $0$ do we get partial derivatives and not total derivatives. (I know that $u$ depends on other variables not just $t$ and am looking for a reason that is more well-defined.)
2026-04-04 11:47:28.1775303248
Letting $\Delta x\to0$ in multivariable chain rule
122 Views Asked by user135842 https://math.techqa.club/user/user135842/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DERIVATIVE
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Partial derivative of a summation
- How might I find, in parametric form, the solution to this (first order, quasilinear) PDE?
- Solving a PDE given initial/boundary conditions.
- Proof for f must be a constant polynomial
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let's approximate $u(x,y)$ near the point $u_0 = u(x_0,y_0)$. If you know how the tangent plane is constructed we have
$$u - u_0 \approx \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(x_0,y_0) (x-x_0) + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}(x_0,y_0) (y-y_0)$$
Now suppose that you parametrized $(x,y)$ as $(x(t),y(t))$ in such a way that $x_0 = x(t_0)$, $y_0 = y(t_0)$ and that the parametrization is differentiable. Then you can write the quotient
$$\frac{u - u_0}{t-t_0} \approx \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(x_0,y_0) \frac{x-x_0}{t-t_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}(x_0,y_0) \frac{y-y_0}{t-t_0}$$
Letting $t \to 0$ gives
$$\frac{du}{dt}(x_0,y_0) = \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(x_0,y_0) \frac{dx}{dt}(t_0) + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}(x_0,y_0)\frac{dy}{dt}(t_0)$$
We have equality because the linear approximation becomes better as $(x,y) \to (x_0,y_0)$. Omitting the specific point we're doing this at yields the chain rule
$$\frac{du}{dt}= \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} \frac{dx}{dt}+ \frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\frac{dy}{dt}$$
The reason that you get $dx/dt$ and not $\partial x/ \partial t$ is because $x$ depends only on $t$ so the two quantities are the same. Now, the question may be where do the partial derivatives come from. For that you'd need to construct the tangent plane itself.