Wolfram alpha gives that this is $0$, but I'm not sure how to show it.
I Tried writing as $\frac{(1-x)^n}{1/n}$ and using L'Hopital's rule, but a new $n$ term shows up every time I take the derivative.
I also try to set $h=\frac1n$ and then write as $$ \lim_{n\to\infty} n(1-x)^n = \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{(1-x)^\frac1h}{h} $$ but same problem, numerator goes to $0$, denominator to $0$, and L'Hôpital doesn't seem to work because the derivative of the numerator gives $\frac1h (1-x)^{\frac1h -1}$, which has the initial trouble
Incrementing $n$ by $1$ has the effect of multiplying $n$ by $\dfrac{n+1} n,$ making it bigger, but also has the effect of multiplying $(1-x)^n$ by $(1-x),$ making it smaller. Which will prevail?
As $n$ grows, it ultimately gets immensely bigger than $\dfrac{1-x} x.$
When that happens, incrementing $n$ by $1$ has the effect of multiplying $n(1-x)^n$ by $\left( 1 + \dfrac 1 n \right)(1-x),$ which is a number less than $1$ and which gets smaller as $n$ grows.
So after reaching some large value of $n$, the rest of the sequence is bounded above by a geometric sequence with a common ratio less than $1;$ thus is approaches $0.$