Can any one help me by following question: Let assume we have two real-valued matrices $A,B\in R^{m\times n}$. Then, let define the matrix $G:=(A+t(B-A))(A+t(B-A))^T$ for a $t\in (0,1)$. Now, I am wondering, which conditions are sufficient to make sure that G is always invertible for every $t\in (0,1)$? BTW: My first thought was that if A and B have full rank, then the line segment between them have also full rank (which concludes that G is invertible) but actually this is not true.
2026-04-06 17:53:29.1775498009
Line segment between two matrices and rank properties
102 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MATRIX-RANK
- Bases for column spaces
- relation between rank of power of a singular matrix with the algebraic multiplicity of zero
- How to determine the rank of the following general $\mathbb{R}$-linear transformation.
- How to prove the dimension identity of subspace? i.e. $\dim(V_1) + \dim(V_2) = \dim(V_1 + V_2) + \dim(V_1 \cap V_2)$
- How can I prove that $[T]_B$ is a reversible matrix?
- can I have $\det(A+B)=0$ if $\det(A)=0$ and $\det(B) \neq 0$?
- Let $A$ be a diagonalizable real matrix such as $A^3=A$. Prove that $\mbox{rank}(A) = \mbox{tr}(A^2)$
- Row permuation of a matrix for a non-zero diagonal
- Tensor rank as a first order formula
- Rank of Matrix , Intersection of 3 planes
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
A square matrix with real entries $M$ is invertible if and only if $MM^T$ so, if you only work with square matrices, then you only need to worry about making sure $A+t(B-A)$ is invertible. If you also assume $A$ is invertible (that's the case $t=0$, by the way), then you can say something reasonably simple:
Basically, you just multiply $A+t(B-A)$ by $A^{-1}$ (which doesn't affect its invertibility) to get $I+t(C-I)$. Then, after a bit of algebra, you see that, for $t \neq 0$, $I+t(C-I)$ is invertible if and only if $C-\frac{1-t}{t}I$ is invertible. Since $\left\{\frac{1-t}{t}: 0 < t < 1\right\} = (-\infty,0)$, we get the desired conclusion.