I am following MIT's calculus videos and I have noticed that when dealing with linear approximations, the professor calculates a set of approximation "formulas" for $x$ near $0$ like $1+x$ for $e^x$ , and when he has to calculate say, $e^{3x}$, he uses the same plugging the factor of $x$ instead of $x$ to get $1+3x$, but he doesn't talk about wether this is a valid thing to do with precalculated approximations other than the ones near 0, and at least with some examples I have tried it doesn't work. I do find logical that this works near $0$ because as $x$ goes to $0$ $x$ multiplied by some factor will also go to $0$, but I'm not sure if that is the actual reason why that works, or even if it works for all approximations near $0$.
So the question is wether this does not work for $x$ not near $0$, and if it works for all approximations near $0$
He uses Maclaurin series for $x$ near $0$ or Taylor series for $x=a$ non necessary $0$.
Generally it's convenient a substitution such that you have to work near $0$.
For example let $f(x)=e^{3x}$, putting $3x=y$ and using $e^y\approx 1+y+\cdots$ and substituting back you'll find $f(x)\approx 1+3x+\cdots$
Another example: let $f(x)=e^{x}$; the approximation of $f$ near $x=-4$ can be found putting $x+4=y$ so that you can use the approximation near $y=0$; because $e^{x}=e^{y-4}=e^{-4}e^y$ and using $e^y\approx 1+y+\cdots$ and substituting back you'll find $f(x)\approx e^{-4}(1+(x+4)+\cdots)$.