Prove that there does not exist a linear self-adjoint operator T on R3 with the standard Euclidean scalar product such that T((1, 2, 3)) = (3, 2, 1) and T((4, 5, 6)) = (4, 5, 6).
Where do I begin? The first thing I think of is representing the transformation as a matrix but I think that even if the transformation is not self-adjoint the matrix can be.
Thanks!
Note that is $\mathbb{R}^3$ a self-adjoint operator is represented by a symmetric matrix. Moreover, symmetric matrix over the reals is orthogonally diagonalizable, that is, there exists an orthogonal matrix $U$ (i.e. $UU^t = I$) such that $U^{-1}TU = D$ is diagonal.
Assume $T$ is self-adjoint. Then there is a diagonal matrix $D$ and an orthogonal matrix $U$ such that $T = U D U^{-1} = U D U^t$. As $D$ is symmetric $$ T^t = (U D U^t)^t = (U^t)^t D^t U^t = U D^t U^t = U D U^t = T $$ and hence $T = T^t$ and $T$ must be symmetric.
Now change and complete $(1,2,3)^t, \ (4,5,6)^t$ the basis into an orthogonal basis (say the standard basis) and show that $T$ is not symmetric.
Note that $T$ is not a symmetric matrix since $$ T = \left[ \begin{matrix} 3 & 4 & a \\ 2 & 5 & b \\ 1 & 6 & c \end{matrix} \right] $$ and $4 \ne 2$.