In Apostol, little-o $f(x) = o(g(x))$ is defined as $\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$. However, in Wiki it is defined as $\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$. How do we determine the limit point from the notation? Is it possible that $f(x) = o(g(x))$ if $x \rightarrow 0$, while $f(x) \neq o(g(x))$, if $x \rightarrow \infty$
2026-04-03 01:43:29.1775180609
On
Little-o notation: limit in the definition
765 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
There are 2 best solutions below
3
On
I'm gonna cite another way to define it without limit of $\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$, maybe this will result easier:
Let be $f : U \longmapsto \mathbb{R},x_{0}$ accumulation point of $f$. We say that $$f = o(g(x)) \hspace{0.2cm} x \to x_{0}$$
If exists $\epsilon : U \longmapsto \mathbb{R} :$
$$f(x) = \epsilon(x) \cdot g(x), \hspace{0.3cm} \lim\limits_{x \to x_{0}} \epsilon(x) = 0$$
We usually point out the limit of $x$ in the text, such as "$f=o(g)$ as $x\to0$" for the first case and "$f=o(g)$ as $x\to\infty$" for the second case.
Yes. For example, $f(x)=x$ and $g(x)=1$.