Good evening to everyone. I was trying to solve an exercise on planar geometry concerning a locus of points. More precisely, the exercise was stating : '' Suppose a line $ \varepsilon $ and a point O outside this line are fixed. We draw an isosceles right triangle $ OAB $ such that A is on the line $ \varepsilon $ and the angle $ OAB $ is right , so $ OA=AB $ . As the point A moves along the line $ \varepsilon $ find the locus of points of the incenters of all those right isosceles triangles. ( The orientation of the letters used to name the vertices must be the same each time )'' . This exercise should be solved only using plane geometry techniques, not Cartesian coordinates for example. Well , I have almost sovled this exercise, namely I found that all these incenters belong to another straight line and I proved it by using the fact that if $ I $ and $ I ' $ are the incenters of the triangles $ OAB $ and $ OA'B' $ , then the triangles $ OAI $ and $ OA'I' $ are similar (because $ \angle{OAI}=\angle{OA'I'}=45^0 $ and $ \angle{AOI}=\angle{A'OI'}=22,5^0 $ ). So, as A moves along the line, we have a collection of similar triangles, which have fixed the vertex O and the vertices A , A', A'' , .... are all collinear,which means that also the other vertices I , I' , I'', ... must be collinear. The final argument was something I remembered from the past, but when I tried to prove it I couldn't ! Is there any idea about how to prove that 3 similar triangles which have the one vertex fixed the other 3 homologous vertices collinear then they necessarily have the third vertices collinear ? Thank you for your help.
2026-03-31 09:56:54.1774951014
Locus of points of the incenter of right isosceles triangles
35 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PLANE-GEOMETRY
- Euclidean Fifth Postulate
- Line coordinates from plane intersection
- Properties of a eclipse on a rotated plane to see a perfect circle from the original plane view?
- Perfect Pascal Mysticum Points
- Intersection of a facet and a plane
- Proving formula to find area of triangle in coordinate geometry.
- Prove that the intersection of a cylinder and a plane forms an ellipse
- Rank of Matrix , Intersection of 3 planes
- Composite of two rotations with different centers
- Can a plane be perpendicular in two other planes if those planes are not parallel to each other?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The similar-triangles-collinear-vertices argument you seek is a well-known one, but I can't find a resource for it online. So here is my sketch of a proof, which is probably not the most elegant but works.
Note that all below point labels are separate from the main part of your problem. Also, when I refer to similar triangles, assume they are also all oriented similarly.
Consider triangles $\triangle XOY$ and $\triangle YOZ$ that are similar; ie. define the angles \begin{align*} \alpha&:=\angle OXY=\angle OYZ\\ \beta &:= \angle OYX = \angle OZY\\ \gamma&:= \angle XOY = \angle YOZ \end{align*} The idea is to construct a new triangle $\triangle AOB$, firstly by selecting a point $A$ on the $XY$ line, then creating line $OA$, then from this line subtending an angle $\gamma$ at $O$ (oriented correctly) to create a line that meets $YZ$ at point $B$.
If we can show that either $\angle OAB=\alpha$ or $\angle OBA=\beta$ (oriented in the correct way), then we are done, because we will have shown that $\triangle AOB$ is also a similar triangle. From here we can argue that if we choose any auxiliary point $A'$ that lies on $XY$ and construct a similar triangle $\triangle A'OB'$ using $OA'$ as the analogous side to $OX$, then $B'$ will necessarily lie on $YZ$.
There are three cases to consider:
Case 1: $A$ lies between $X$ and $Y$
Consider the quadrilateral $\square OAYB$. We know $$\angle AYB = \angle OYX+\angle OYZ = \alpha+\beta$$ Its opposite angle is $$\angle AOB=\gamma$$ But we know $\alpha+\beta+\gamma=180^\circ$ as they are the interior angles of the similar triangles. So, $\square OAYB$ is cyclic. By the bowtie theorem, we have the final step, after which we are done: $$\angle OAB=\angle OYB(=\angle OYZ)=\alpha$$
Cases 2 and 3: $A$ lies on $XY$ but not between $X$ and $Y$
Again, under these cases we can prove that the respective quadrilaterals $\square OYAB$ or $\square OABY$ are cyclic, and from here use analogous angle-chasing arguments to show $\triangle AOB$ is similar.