Suppose $\mathscr{H}$ is a separable Hilbert space. Let the class of bounded operators and bounded trace operators are given by $\mathfrak{B}(\mathscr{H})$ and $\mathfrak{I}_1(\mathscr{H})$ respectively. Let also the set of all positive operators with trace one is given by $\mathfrak{S}(\mathscr{H})$; $\mathfrak{S} (\mathscr{H})\subseteq \mathfrak{I}_1(\mathscr{H})$. Suppose there exists a self adjoint operator $A \in \mathfrak{B}(\mathscr{H})$ such there exists $p_\ast \in \mathfrak{S}(\mathscr{H})$ satisfies, $$ tr\left(A(p - p_\ast)\right) > 0, \forall p \in \mathfrak{S}(\mathscr{H}) \backslash p_\ast $$ where $tr(A p_\ast)$ is allowed to be zero. Is it possible to have some lower bound relation in the following form: $$ \kappa \left\|p - p_\ast\right\|_1^m \leq tr\left(A(p - p_\ast)\right), , \forall p \in \mathfrak{S}(\mathscr{H}) \backslash p_\ast $$ for some $m \geq 1$ and $\kappa >0$, where $\left\| \cdot \right\|_1$ is the norm for Trace class operator?
2026-04-02 03:15:07.1775099707
Lower bound of trace norm on operator multiplication
309 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in TRACE
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- Basis-free proof of the fact that traceless linear maps are sums of commutators
- $\mathrm{tr}(AB)=\mathrm{tr}(BA)$ proof
- Similar 2x2 matrices of trace zero
- Basis of Image and kernel of Linear Transformation $\mathbb(M_{2,2})\rightarrow\mathbb(R^3) = (trace(A), 5*Trace(A), - Trace(A))$
- Replace $X$ with $\mbox{diag}(x)$ in trace matrix derivative identity
- Proving that a composition of bounded operator and trace class operator is trace class
- If $A \in \mathcal M_n(\mathbb C)$ is of finite order then $\vert \operatorname{tr}(A) \vert \le n$
- Characterisations of traces on $F(H)$
- "Symmetry of trace" passage in the proof of Chern Weil.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $H=\ell^2(\mathbb N)$ with $\{E_{kj}\}\subset B(H)$ the corresponding canonical matrix units.
Let $$S(H)=\{E_{11},E_{22},\ldots\},\ \ \ A=\sum_{k=2}^\infty \frac1k\,E_{kk},\ \ \ \ p_*=E_{11}.$$ Then $$ \text{Tr}(A(p-p_*))=\text{Tr}(A(E_{kk}-E_{11})=\frac1k>0. $$ And $$ \|p-p_*\|_1=\text{Tr}\,((E_{kk}-E_{11})^2)^{1/2}=\text{Tr}\,(E_{kk}+E_{11})^{1/2}=\sqrt2. $$
So for all $\kappa>0$ and $m\geq1$ the inequality fails for sufficiently large $k$ (i.e., $k>\frac1{\kappa\sqrt2}$).
Edit: I think with the interpretation that $S(H)$ consists of all positive operators with trace one, the inequality $\text{Tr}(A(p-p_*))>0$ for all $p$ is impossible.
Write $p_*=\sum_j\mu_jP_j$, where $\mu_j\geq0$, $\sum \mu_j=1$, and $P_j$ is a rank-one projection for all $j$. Assume, without loss of generality, that $\mu_j>0$ for all $j$. Let $p=\mu_1Q_1+\sum_{j\geq2}\mu_jP_j$, with $Q_1\ne P_1$. Then $$ 0<\text{Tr}(A(p-p_*))=\mu_1\,\text{Tr}(A(Q_1-P_1)). $$ So $\text{Tr}(AP_1)<\text{Tr}(AQ_1)$ for all rank-one projections $Q_1$ . In particular, if $P_k\ne P_1$, then $$\tag1\text{Tr}(AP_1)<\text{Tr}(AP_k).$$ Now let $p=\mu_kP_1+\sum_{j\ne k}\mu_jP_j$. Then $$ 0<\text{Tr}(A(p-p_*))=\mu_k\,\text{Tr}(A(P_1-P_k)), $$ and we obtain $$\tag2 \text{Tr}(AP_k)<\text{Tr}(AP_1), $$ contradicting $(1)$. The only way to avoid this is that $p_*$ is a rank-one projection $P$. So now, for every positive trace-one operator $Q$ (in particular, rank-one projections) other than $P_1$ we have $$\tag3 \text{Tr}(AP_1)<\text{Tr}(AQ). $$