The following problem is chapter 1 Exercise 15 in Stein's Real analysis. Let $E\subset\mathbb{R}^d$ and $E\subset\bigcup_{j=1}^\infty R_j$ where $R_j$ are closed rectangles in $\mathbb{R}^d$. Define $m_*^R(E)=$inf$\Sigma_{j=1}^\infty |R_j|$ where $|R_j|$ denote its volume. Need to show $m_*(E)=m_*^R(E)$ for any $E\subset\mathbb{R}^d$ (Note that $m_*(E)$=inf$\Sigma_{j=1}^\infty |Q_j|$ where $E\subset\bigcup_{j}^\infty Q_j$ with $Q_j$ are closed cubes in $\mathbb{R}^d$) There is one hint: (Lemma 1.1) If a ractangle is the almost disjoint union of finitely many other rectangles, say $R=\bigcup_{k=1}^N R_k$, then $|R|=\Sigma_{k=1}^N |R_k|$. $m_*^R(E)\leq m_*(E)$ is clear from the definition. The problem is the reverse inequality. How could I use that given hint? Thanks in advanced.
2026-03-26 22:17:25.1774563445
$m_*^R(E)=m_*(E)$ where $m_*$ is an outer measure.
362 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in OUTER-MEASURE
- True or False Question on Outer measure.
- Which of the following is an outer measure?
- Which of the following is true about lebesgue measure
- set of points in $E_n$ infinitely often and almost always are in $\sigma$-algebra
- A countable set has outer measure zero. Explanation of Royden example.
- Finding all outer measures on a finite set
- Outer measure in a finite measure space.
- Can a compact connected set in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with empty interior have positive Lebesgue measure?
- n dimensional measure of homeomorphism of interval
- Let $\mu$ be a finite measure on $(X, M)$, and let $\mu^*$ be the outermeasure induced by $\mu$.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
As you have noted, that $m_*^R(E)\leq m_*(E)$ is clear because squares are indeed a type of rectangle. For the reverse direction, the intuition is to find a way to cover any rectangle from above, by squares, in such a way so that the "wasted" area (i.e. non-overlapping, or with minimal spillage over the boundary) is minimized. Here is one way to do this. Choose given a rectangle $R$, choose rational numbers $q_1,\cdots,q_d$ slightly larger than the side lengths of $R$, say so that $\prod q_i<|R|+\epsilon$. Then, there is a rectangle $R'$ with the side lengths $q_1,\cdots,q_d$ whose volume is within $\epsilon$ to $|R|$. Take a common denominator $l$ of $q_1,\cdots,q_d$, then $R'$ can be covered by a finite grid $\{Q_i\}$ of almost disjoint cubes with side length $l$. By the hint, $\sum |Q_i| = |R'|$, in particular $\sum |Q_i|<|R|+\epsilon$. Given some $E\subset \mathbb{R}^d$, suppose you pick an almost minimizing sequence of rectangles $R_1,R_2,\cdots,$ so that $\sum|R_j|\leq m_*^R(E)+\epsilon$. Now repeat the previous procedure for each rectangle $R_j$: given fixed $j$, choose finitely many cubes $Q_{j,k}$ so that $\sum_{k} |Q_{j,k}|<|R_j|+\frac{\epsilon}{2^j}$, then $ \sum |Q_{j,k}|<\sum |R_j|+\epsilon \leq m_*^R(E)+2\epsilon$. As $Q_{j,k}$ is a countable collection of cubes, and $\epsilon$ was arbitrary, we see that the reverse inequality also holds.