Given the field $K = \mathbb{Q}(\vartheta)$ with $\vartheta = \sqrt{-73}$, I'm trying to determine the structure of the class group $\mathrm{Cl}(K)$. By using the Minkowski Theorem and Kummer-Dedekind Theorem, I determined that $\mathrm{Cl}(K)$ is generated by the ideal classes of the ideals $$ \mathfrak{p}_{2} = \langle 2, \vartheta - 1 \rangle, \hspace{20pt} \mathfrak{p}_{71} = \langle 7, \vartheta - 2 \rangle, \hspace{20pt} \mathfrak{p}_{72} = \langle 7, \vartheta + 2 \rangle, $$ where $$ \mathfrak{p}_{2}^{2} = \langle 2 \rangle, \hspace{20pt} \mathfrak{p}_{71}\mathfrak{p}_{72} = \langle 7 \rangle. $$ Thus, by writing $[\mathfrak{p}_{i}]$ for the ideal class of the ideal $\mathfrak{p}_{i}$, we have $$ [\mathfrak{p}_{2}]^{2} = [1] \hspace{20pt}\text{and}\hspace{20pt} [\mathfrak{p}_{71}][\mathfrak{p}_{2}] = [1] $$ so that $$ [\mathfrak{p}_{2}] = [\mathfrak{p}_{2}]^{-1} \hspace{20pt}\text{and}\hspace{20pt} [\mathfrak{p}_{71}] = [\mathfrak{p}_{2}]^{-1}. $$ I'm trying to determine the order of and relationship between the ideal classes. For example, I tried to determine the product $[\mathfrak{p}_{2}][\mathfrak{p}_{71}]$ by finding the product $\mathfrak{p}_{2}\mathfrak{p}_{71}$. This is where I encounter an issue.
By expressing the ideals as their generators, we have $$ \mathfrak{p}_{2}\mathfrak{p}_{71} = \langle 2, \vartheta - 1 \rangle\langle 7, \vartheta - 2 \rangle = \langle 14, 2\vartheta - 4, 7\vartheta - 7, -71 + 3\vartheta \rangle $$ since $\vartheta^{2} = -73$. Then $$ \begin{array}{c} (-71 + 3\vartheta) + 5(14) = -1 + 3\vartheta \in \mathfrak{p}_{2}\mathfrak{p}_{71},\\ (-7 + 7\vartheta) - 3(2\vartheta - 4) = 5 + \vartheta \in \mathfrak{p}_{2}\mathfrak{p}_{71},\\ (-4 + 2\vartheta) - 5(-1 + 3\vartheta) = 1 - 13\vartheta \in \mathfrak{p}_{2}\mathfrak{p}_{71},\\ 13(5 + \vartheta) + (1 - 13\vartheta) = 66 \in \mathfrak{p}_{2}\mathfrak{p}_{71}.\\ \end{array} $$ Now $66 - 4(14) = 10 \in \mathfrak{p}_{2}\mathfrak{p}_{71}$, and then $14 - 10 = 4 \in \mathfrak{p}_{2}\mathfrak{p}_{71}$, so that $14 - 2(4) = 2 \in \mathfrak{p}_{2}\mathfrak{p}_{71}$.
Now that $2 \in \mathfrak{p}_{2}\mathfrak{p}_{71}$, we can observe that $$ (5 + \vartheta) - 3(2) = \vartheta - 1 \in \mathfrak{p}_{2}\mathfrak{p}_{71}, $$ and then each of the generators $$ 14, 2\vartheta - 4, 7\vartheta - 7, -71 + 3\vartheta $$ are $\mathbb{Z}[\vartheta]$-linear combinations of $2$ and $\vartheta - 1$, so $$ \mathfrak{p}_{2}\mathfrak{p}_{71} = \langle 2, \vartheta - 1 \rangle\langle 7, \vartheta - 2 \rangle = \langle 14, 2\vartheta - 4, 7\vartheta - 7, -71 + 3\vartheta \rangle = \langle 2, \vartheta - 1 \rangle = \mathfrak{p}_{2} $$ and thus $$ \mathfrak{p}_{2}\mathfrak{p}_{71} = \mathfrak{p}_{2}. $$ This does not feel right at all. Have I just made a silly mistake somewhere, or is there something going on that I'm unaware of?
Let us use sage to make the computations. First of all, let us have a clear picture of the class group of the given field. Code:
Results:
Sage uses the generator:
Now back to the post.
So the class of $\mathfrak p_2\cdot \mathfrak p_{72}$ is not trivial.
The error was in the first line of the computation, note that
so there is a minus three as coefficient. The difference is:
(The underscore stays for the "last result so far".)