The complex semisimple Lie algebra $\mathcal{L}$ includes the Cartan subalgebra $h_\alpha \in H$ and $e_\alpha$, where $\alpha$ are the roots. Why do they want to find the matrix representations for $ad(e_\alpha)$ instead of $e_\alpha$ to construct generators for the exceptional groups? My answer would be that, to write the generators in matrix form one should first take the map of ad from the lie algebra of $E_n$ to the lie algebra of $gl(n)$ and the map of Ad from the group $E_n$ to $GL(n)$, where $exp(tad(e_\alpha))=Ad(exp(te_\alpha))$, where the map Ad somehow is I? But this confuses me so I am not sure if that is the correct reason why.
2026-04-06 03:24:55.1775445895
Matrix generators for exceptional lie algebras
179 Views Asked by user731856 https://math.techqa.club/user/user731856/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LIE-GROUPS
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- homomorphism between unitary groups
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Is it true that if a Lie group act trivially on an open subset of a manifold the action of the group is trivial (on the whole manifold)?
- Find non-zero real numbers $a,b,c,d$ such that $a^2+c^2=b^2+d^2$ and $ab+cd=0$.
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I don't know why this was downvoted, it seems fine to me.
A matrix representation is always a matrix representation of a linear map. Elements of an abstract Lie algebra are not in themselves linear maps so there is nothing to take a matrix representation of.
Let's say someone gave you an abstract Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ in terms of generators and relations and asked you to write down the matrix representation of the element $X \in \mathfrak{g}$. Then you could not answer it because the question is meaningless.
By contrast, the map $ad(X)$ is a linear map: it maps elements of $\mathfrak{g}$ to elements of $\mathfrak{g}$ by the rule $Y \mapsto [X, Y]$. So it makes sense to ask for a matrix representation of $ad(X)$ w.r.t. a given basis of $\mathfrak{g}$.
Similarly if you were given some map $\phi: \mathfrak{g} \to End(V)$ for some vector space $V$ we could ask about the matrix representation of $\phi(X)$ w.r.t. some basis of $V$. (Of course in practice this would only be interesting if $\phi$ is a Lie algebra morphism from $\mathfrak{g}$ to $\mathfrak{gl}(V)$, but this typically still leaves infinitely many choices on $V$'s of many different dimensions.)
Now in general Lie algebras do not come with a 'standard' map $\phi$ to the endomorphisms of some vector space and hence we cannot talk about 'the' matrix representation of a Lie algebra element - we first need to specify a way of transforming Lie algebra elements into linear maps. There are typically infinitely many choices but using $ad$ has the advantage that it is always available, and natural.
Now when you are looking at a Lie algebra that is defined as a set of linear maps with a certain property then we have a second 'natural' choice beyond ad of a way of assigning a linear map to each Lie algebra element because there the Lie algebra element is a linear map by construction. Examples are the Lie algebras of type $\mathfrak{gl}, \mathfrak{sl}, \mathfrak{so}$ etc. But in a sense they are the exception. Exceptional simple Lie algebras, but also non-semisimple Lie algbras and Lie algebras that are secretely $\mathfrak{sl}_n$ for some $n$ but you don't recognize it because it is defined in terms of cartan matrices rather than matrices don't automatically come with a 'prefered' choice of interpreting their elements as linear maps and hence the question of what is 'the' matrix representation of the element doesn't make much sense.