I need help with the following proof:Prove Weierstrass Maximum Theorem for the special case in which $(X; dX) $ is the usual Euclidean vector space $(\Bbb{R}^n;d2)$ .
2026-04-01 15:40:03.1775058003
Maximum Value Theorem proof in a eucledian sapce
39 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in COMPACTNESS
- Every nonempty perfect set in $\mathbb R^k$ is uncountable: Rudin's argument
- Help in understanding proof of Heine-Borel Theorem from Simmons
- Is the distance between those compact sets equal to $0$?
- Are compact groups acting on Polish spaces essentially Polish?
- Set of Positive Sequences that Sum to 1 is Compact under Product Topology?
- The space $D(A^\infty)$
- Proving the one-point compactification of a topological space is a topology
- Never Used Compact Closure...
- Continuity of the maximal element of a multi-valued function
- Consider the metric space of infinite sequences of 0s and 1s under this metric.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I guess you mean Weierstrass extreme value theorem. A generalization of its case for the reals proposed in Wikipedia states that if $K$ is a compact set and $f:K\to\Bbb R$ is a continuous function, then $f(K)$ is bounded and there exist $p,q\in K$ such that $f(p)=\sup_{x\in K} f(x)$ and $f(q)=\inf_{x\in K} f(x)$. In Wikipedia continuity of the function $f$ is defined in terms of open sets, but it is easy to show that a function $f$ is continuous according to Wikipedia definition iff $f$ is continuous according to the usual definition in terms of $\varepsilon$ and $\delta$. Also recall that by Heine-Borel Theorem, a subset $S$ of $\Bbb R^n$ is compact iff $S$ is closed (that is, for each $x\in \Bbb R^n\setminus S$ there exists $\varepsilon>0$ such that for each $y\in \Bbb R^n$ with $dX(x,y)<\varepsilon$ we have $y\in \Bbb R^n\setminus S$ too) and bounded (that is, for each $\varepsilon>0$ there exists a finite subset $F$ of $S$ such that for each $x\in S$ there exists $y\in F$ such that $dX(x,y)<\varepsilon$).
Therefore we have the following generalization of Weierstrass extreme value theorem.
Theorem If $K\subset\Bbb R^n$ is a non-empty closed and bounded set and $f:K\to\Bbb R$ is a continuous function, then $f(K)$ is bounded and there exist $p,q\in K$ such that $f(p)=\sup_{x\in K} f(x)$ and $f(q)=\inf_{x\in K} f(x)$.
In order to prove the theorem we use the preservation of compactness by continuous maps.
Lemma. If $V, W$ are topological spaces, $F:V\to W$ is a continuous function, and $K\subset V$ is compact, then $f(K)\subset W$ is also compact.
Proof. Let $\mathcal W$ be any open cover of the set $f(K)$. By continuity of the map $f$, a family $\{f^{-1}(U):U\in\mathcal W\}$ is an open cover of the set $K$. Since the set $K$ is compact, it has a finite subcover $\{f^{-1}(U):U\in\mathcal W_0\}$. Then $\mathcal W_0$ is a finite cover of the set $f(K)$. $\square$
Proof of Theorem. By Heine-Borel Theorem, $K$ is compact. By Lemma, $f(K)$ is compact. Again by Heine-Borel Theorem, $f(K)$ is closed and bounded in $\Bbb R$. It is easy to show that $f(K)$ is a segment, that is $f(K)=[\inf_{x\in K} f(x), \sup_{x\in K} f(x)]$. Thus $\inf_{x\in K} f(x)\in f(K)$ and $\sup_{x\in K} f(x)\in f(K)$. $\square$