Suppose $G = (V,E)$ is minimally k edge connected, meaning $\forall e \in E$, $G - e$ is less than k edge connected. I want to show the minimum degree of the graph is k. I was thinking suppose the min. degree $> k$ at say vertex $v$, then this contradicts $G$ being minimally k edge connected, but I am not sure how to proceed.
2026-04-08 07:54:29.1775634869
minimally k edge connected graph
693 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GRAPH-THEORY
- characterisation of $2$-connected graphs with no even cycles
- Explanation for the static degree sort algorithm of Deo et al.
- A certain partition of 28
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Is it true that if a graph is bipartite iff it is class 1 (edge-coloring)?
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- Triangle-free graph where every pair of nonadjacent vertices has exactly two common neighbors
- Inequality on degrees implies perfect matching
- Proving that no two teams in a tournament win same number of games
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If $G$ is minimally $k$-edge-connected, then every edge of $G$ is part of some cut of size $k$. (Given any edge $e$, there must be a size-$(k-1)$ cut in $G-e$, by minimality. Together with $e$ itself, this gives a size-$k$ cut in $G$ containing $e$.)
For $S \subseteq V(G)$, let $[S,\overline{S}]$ denote denote the number of edges from $S$ to $\overline{S} = V(G) \setminus S$.
Choose $X \subseteq V(G)$ to be a smallest set of vertices with $|[X, \overline{X}]|= k$. We'd like to show that $X$ consists of just a single vertex, because then we've found a vertex of degree $k$.
Suppose for the sake of contradiction that $X$ is larger than that. Let $e$ be any edge inside $X$, and let $Y$ be a set of vertices with $|[Y, \overline{Y}]| = k$ and $e \in [Y, \overline{Y}]$. In general, for any $X, Y \subseteq V(G)$, we have $$ |[X \cap Y, \overline{X \cap Y}]| + |[X \cup Y, \overline{X \cup Y}]| \le |[X, \overline{X}]| + |[Y, \overline{Y}]| $$ because:
In this particular case, we have $|[X, \overline{X}]| = |[Y, \overline{Y}]| = k$, and by $k$-connectedness, $[X \cap Y, \overline{X \cap Y}]$ and $[X \cup Y, \overline{X \cup Y}]$ can't be smaller than $k$, so they also both have size $k$.
But now $X \cap Y$ is a strictly smaller set than $X$ with $|[X \cap Y, \overline{X \cap Y}]| = k$, contradicting the way we chose the set $X$. So it's impossible for $X$ to contain more than a single vertex, and therefore we've found a vertex of degree $k$.