I'm comfortable with fractions like $\frac{-3}{8}$ being the same as $\frac{3}{-8}$ (though I'd think the latter anachronistic and would in any case probably prefer to write either of those two as $-\frac{3}{8}$ ), and of course I'm comfortable with improper fractions like $\frac{-8}{3}$ being the mixed number $-2\frac{2}{3}$.
However, if I'm trying to teach a computer how to handle negative vulgar fractions, I should also consider the remaining cases, so how should I interpret:
- $2\frac{-2}{3}$
- $2\frac{2}{-3}$
- $2\frac{-2}{-3}$
- $-2\frac{-2}{3}$
- $-2\frac{2}{-3}$
- $-2\frac{-2}{-3}$
I'm considering the logical approach, by inference from $2\frac{2}{3}$ and $-2\frac{2}{3}$, so I'd get:
- $1\frac{1}{3}$
- $1\frac{1}{3}$
- $1\frac{2}{3}$
- $-1\frac{1}{3}$
- $-1\frac{1}{3}$
- $-2\frac{2}{3}$
Section 3.8 of Charles McKeague's Pre-Algebra: A Text/Workbook has the key information, with worked examples.
$$3\frac{2}{3} - 1\frac{1}{6}$$ is implicitly bracketed as $$\left(3\frac{2}{3}\right) - \left(1\frac{1}{6}\right)$$ so the answer in this example is $$2\frac{1}{2}$$
Applying that the the examples in the original question is then straightforward, and the proposed interpretations are correct.
Edit: Answers at Primary/Elementary Pedagogy: What is the rationale for the absent '+' in mixed fractions? also indicate the reason why we write a mixed number as $1\frac{1}{2}$ and not as $1+\frac{1}{2}$.