Take an open subset $D\subset\Bbb C^m$.
I suspect there is no holomorphic injective mapping $f:D\to \Bbb C^n$ if $m>n$.
Is this true?
Being $f$ injective holomorphic then it must be regular (that is its differential has maximum rank at each point), so the image is an open set in $\Bbb C^n$, then, intuitively, being the target too tight because of the smaller dimension, there is no room for the image of an injective mapping. But how can we prove it?
Invariance of domain is one way to go, but I think that's too much machinery. An alternative proof can be given using the constant-rank theorem (which is equivalent to the inverse function theorem and also to the implicit function theorem, and these are certainly available to students after a multivariable calculus course). We can actually prove this theorem:
To prove this, let $r$ be the maximum rank of $f$ on $D$, i.e \begin{align} r:=\max\{\text{rank}(Df_x)\,|\,\,\, x\in D\} \end{align} The maximum exists because this is a finite non-empty set of integers. Suppose $a\in D$ is a point where $r=\text{rank}(Df_a)$. Since the rank cannot decrease locally, and $r$ is the maximum rank, it follows there is an open set $A\subset D$ containing $a$, such that $f$ has constant rank $r$ on $A$. Therefore, by the constant rank theorem, there exist $C^1$ diffeomorphisms
such that $f(A')\subset B$ and the composition $\psi\circ (f|_{A'})\circ \phi^{-1}:\phi[A']\subset\Bbb{R}^m\to\Bbb{R}^n$ is equal to the rank $r$ linear transformation \begin{align} (x^1,\dots, x^m)\mapsto (x^1,\dots, x^r,0,\dots, 0) \end{align} Since $m>n\geq \min(m,n)\geq r$, it follows that $\psi\circ f\circ \phi^{-1}$ is not injective. Since $\psi,\phi$ are $C^1$ diffeomorphisms (in particular bijections), it follows that the restriction $f|_{A'}$ and hence $f$ are not injective.
Finally, in your case, holomorphic maps are certainly $C^1$, so by considering $\Bbb{C}^n\cong \Bbb{R}^{2n}$ etc it follows there is no holomorphic injective mapping $f:D\subset\Bbb{C}^m\to\Bbb{C}^n$ if $m>n$. (or you could repeat this entire argument, because the inverse function theorem, implicit function theorem, constant rank theorem all have natural analogues in the holomorphic case).