We know non-singular projective variety is a manifold, then it's natural to ask when a non-singular projective(affine) variety can be given a CW-structure? Is there any reference to give a proof?
2026-03-25 09:31:55.1774431115
non-singular variety and CW complex structure
419 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-TOPOLOGY
- How to compute homology group of $S^1 \times S^n$
- the degree of a map from $S^2$ to $S^2$
- Show $f$ and $g$ are both homeomorphism mapping of $T^2$ but $f$ is not homotopy equivalent with $g.$
- Chain homotopy on linear chains: confusion from Hatcher's book
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Are these cycles boundaries?
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- Cohomology groups of a torus minus a finite number of disjoint open disks
- CW-structure on $S^n$ and orientations
Related Questions in CW-COMPLEXES
- CW complexes are compactly generated
- If $(X, \Gamma)$ is a cell complex and $e \in \Gamma$, then the image of a characteristic map for $e$ equals its closure
- Universal covering space of $\mathbb{R^3}\setminus S^1$
- Are all cell decompositions useful?
- Give an example of an open cell in a cell complex for which the image of the characteristic map is not a closed cell.
- Computing cellular homology of the sphere using a different CW structure
- Showing that a CW complex is compactly generated
- CW complex with fundamental group $\Bbb Z/n$
- CW complex definition ambiguity
- CW complex for Möbius strip
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If $X \subset \Bbb{CP}^n$ is a non-singular algebraic variety then on any affine chart $\text{U} \subset \Bbb{CP}^n$, the subvariety $\text{U} \cap X$ is cut out of $\text{U}$, which we identify with $\Bbb C^n$, using a system of polynomial equations $f_1 = \cdots = f_m = 0$ where they jointly constitute a map $F =(f_1, \cdots, f_m) : \Bbb C^n \to \Bbb C^m$ such that $0$ is a regular value of $F$. By inverse function theorem, this implies $X$ is locally a smooth submanifold of $\Bbb{CP}^n$, hence globally so as well.
In particular, $X$ is a compact smooth manifold. Such things always admit triangulation: Consider a Morse function $f : X \to \Bbb R$ and we can ensure that the critical values are arranged $c_0 < c_1 < \cdots < c_m$ in the increasing order of index $0 = \lambda_0 < \lambda_1 < \cdots < \lambda_m = \dim X$. By Morse theory, $f^{-1}[c_0, c_k + \varepsilon]$ is obtained from $f^{-1}[c_0, c_k - \varepsilon]$ by attatching a $\lambda_k$-handle ($D^{\lambda_k} \times D^{2n - \lambda_k})$ to the boundary $f^{-1}(c_k - \varepsilon)$ of $f^{-1}[c_0, c_k - \varepsilon]$. Write $M_k = f^{-1}[c_0, c_k - \varepsilon]$, where $\varepsilon$ is sufficiently small so that there is a unique critical value, namely $c_k$, between $c_k - \varepsilon$ and $c_k + \varepsilon$ for all $k$. Then $X$ has a filtration $M_1 \subset M_2 \subset \cdots \subset M_{m - 1} \subset M$ such that each $M_{k+1}$ is iteratively obtained from $M_k$ upto homeomorphism using the handle-attatching recipie above. This gives a handlebody decomposition of $X$, and by collapsing each handle to it's core, we get a CW-decomposition of $X$. See, for example, Milnor "Morse theory".
If $X \subset \Bbb C^n$ is an affine variety, similar arguments as above would work. In this case there's a very natural Morse function $L_p : X \to \Bbb R$ given by $L_p(\mathbf{x}) = \|\mathbf{x} - p\|^2$, that is the squared-distance from $p$. For generic choice of $p$, this can be shown to be a Morse function (roughly speaking, the critical points of $L_p$ occur where the secant joining $\mathbf{x}$ and $p$ points normally to $X$, and it is a degenerate critical point if there is some tangent direction in $T_\mathbf{x} X$, the normals keep intersecting $p$ even when shifted along that direction, so that $p$ is a focal point of $M$ near $\mathbf{x}$ with a certain multiplicity determined by the number of independent tangent directions along which this happens. Fortunately, focal points to $X$ form a measure zero subset of $\Bbb C^n$)
As an addendum, the "nonsingular" hypothesis should not be really necessary. If $X \subset \Bbb{CP}^n$ is an arbitrary projective algebraic variety, then notice that the subset $X_{sing} \subset X$ consisting of the singular points of $X$ form a subvariety. This can be checked locally on an affine chart: say $A \subset \Bbb C^n$ is an affine variety cut out by $f_1, \cdots, f_m$. Then $A_{sing} \subset A$ consists of the points where rank of the Jacobian $J(f_1, \cdots, f_m)$ is strictly less than $m$. This is the algebraic condition that $\det J = 0$, which therefore cuts out $A_{sing} \subset A$ as an algebraic subvariety. However this singular subvariety might also be singular! So we can iteratively build a filtration $X_0 \subset X_1 \subset \cdots \subset X_{k-1} \subset X_k = X$ where $X_{i - 1}$ is the singular subvariety of $X_i$, so $X_i \setminus X_{i-1}$ is a smooth quasiprojective variety.
I haven't checked, but this should be a Whitney stratification of $X$. I intuit this as follows: it's a corollary of Thom's first isotopy lemma that Whitney stratified spaces are locally conical, that is, if $L_1, L_2$ are two strata such that $L_1 \subset \overline{L_2}$ then any $p \in L_1$ has a neighborhood $U$ in $\overline{L_2}$ such that there is a stratum-preserving homeomorphism $U \to \Bbb R^k \times \text{Cone}(S)$ where $S$ is a stratified set of appropriate dimension. But in the case of algebraic varieties, we already have cone-like neighborhoods to singular points given by the Zariski tangent cone! EDIT: This statement is not true, as pointed out correctly in the comments. It's instructive to look at a kind of example described by Stephen, given by $X = \{(x, y, z) \in \Bbb C^3 : y^2 = x^3 + z^2x^2\}$. The singular set is given by $X_0 = \{x = y = 0\}$ as can be checked by computing when the Jacobian of $y^2 - x^3 - z^2x^2$ vanishes. However $(X_0, X \setminus X_0)$ does not satisfy the Whitney condition (b), as can be checked by looking at the real locus: the limiting tangent planes along any appropriate sequence of points $p_n \to (0, 0, 0)$ converges to the plane $z = 0$, whereas the secants joining $p_n$ with $(0, 0, 1/n)$ converge to a line in $x = y = 0$, which is orthogonal to the limiting tangent plane! The problem, however, is resolved by taking $X_1 = \{(0, 0, 0)\}$ and defining a refined stratification $(X, X_0 \setminus X_1, X_1)$ which turns out to be a Whitney stratification. It's in fact a theorem of Whitney that any complex projective variety can be stratified and his idea seems to be precisely to come up with a finer stratification than the singular stratification where the condition (b) works. I haven't read the proof, but I plan to in the near future.
Goresky has proved here that any Thom-Mather stratified space admits a triangulation. Whitney stratified spaces always admit controlled tubular neighborhoods (See, for example, Mather's "Notes on Topological Stability"), so are in particular triangulable.