I want to prove that Hölder space is a Banach space under the "Hölder Norm" ie. $\|\cdot\|_{C^{k,\alpha}}$. Any hints would be appreciable .
2026-03-29 03:27:41.1774754861
Norm on a Hölder's space
4.7k Views Asked by user17762 https://math.techqa.club/user/user17762/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in HOLDER-SPACES
- Embeddings between Hölder spaces $ C^{0,\beta} \hookrightarrow C^{0, \alpha} .$
- Holder seminorm of log inequality
- Is it a equivalent semi norm in Campanato space?
- Finite dimensionality of the "deRham cohomology" defined using $C^{k,\alpha}$ forms instead of smooth forms.
- Question on definition of $\;\alpha-$Holder norms
- Piecewise Holder functions
- What is little Holder space?
- What about an approximation of the Hölder's constant associated to $\sum_{n=0}^\infty\gamma^n\cos(11^n\pi x)$, where $\gamma$ is the Euler's constant?
- Is the power of a Holder continuous function still Holder continuous?
- Does taking a fractional derivative remove a fractional amount of Holder regularity?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
HINT:If I assume you already have proved or known that
Then you need to check if the following facts still hold after the introduction of that extra $C^{0,\gamma}(\Omega)$-seminorm:
Check if $[\cdot]_{\gamma}$ is a seminorm on $C^{0,\gamma}(\Omega)$, ie triangle inequality and linearity, this would imply that $\| u\|_{C^k(\Omega)} + \sum\limits_{|\alpha|= k}[\partial_{\alpha} u]_{\gamma}$ is a norm.
Check for any Cauchy sequence $\{u_n\}$ in $C^{k,\gamma}(\Omega)$, it will converge to a limit also lying in $C^{k,\gamma}(\Omega)$. This could be done as matgaio suggested in his comment, Being Cauchy in $C^{k,\gamma}(\Omega)$-norm implies being Cauchy in $C^{k}(\Omega)$-norm, knowing the completeness of $C^{k}(\Omega)$, we know there exists a limit $u$, we would like to show this $u$ lies in $C^{k,\gamma}(\Omega)$ too, ie for any $|\alpha| = k$, $[\partial_{\alpha} u]_{\gamma} < \infty$.
Last but not least, because the previous argument only deals with the $C^k(\Omega)$-limit $u$ of a $C^{k,\gamma}(\Omega)$ Cauchy sequence lies in $C^{k,\gamma}(\Omega)$, we now need to check the $C^{k,\gamma}(\Omega)$-limit of $u_n$ is still $u$, since the first $k$-derivative's convergence is already guaranteed, it suffices to show that for any $|\alpha|=k$, $[\partial_{\alpha} u_n - \partial_{\alpha} u]_{\gamma} \to 0$.
And these three together with $C^{k}(\Omega)$ being Banach would imply $C^{k,\gamma}(\Omega)$ is Banach. If you have any question about some specific proof, I could edit my answer with some details about the proof.
EDIT:How do we proveFor this claim we first need to prove that $(C(\Omega), \sup\limits_{x\in \Omega} |\cdot|)$ is Banach, normally we say here $C(\Omega)$ denotes the bounded continuous function, if $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^d$ is closed and bounded already, we could remove the "bounded" part. To prove this, we need to check:
$$ \sup\limits_{x\in \Omega} |u| = 0 \text{ if and only if } u = 0 $$
$$ \sup\limits_{x\in \Omega} |\lambda u| = |\lambda|\,\sup\limits_{x\in \Omega} | u| $$
If above are checked, then we could say $(C(\Omega), \sup\limits_{x\in \Omega} |\cdot|)$ is Banach, and for $\left(C^k(\Omega),\sum\limits_{|\alpha|\leq k} \sup\limits_{x\in \Omega} |\partial_{\alpha}(\cdot)|\right)$, the sum of the supreme of every derivative's absolute value being a norm is not hard to check. For the completeness part, the sequence $\{u_n\}$ being Cauchy implies that $\{\partial_{\alpha} u_n\}_{|\alpha| = i}$ for any $i\leq k$ is Cauchy, use above argument for $C(\Omega)$, we know that $\{u_n\}$ and every $\{\partial_{\alpha} u_n\}_{|\alpha| = i}$ would converge to a bounded continuous function, the rest is to check the limits coincide, ie: $$ \text{If } u = \lim_{n\to \infty} u_n, v = \lim_{n\to \infty} \partial_{\alpha}u_n. \;\text{Then } v = \partial_{\alpha} u $$
Once you have checked all of these, you have shown $$\left(C^k(\Omega),\sum\limits_{|\alpha|\leq k} \sup\limits_{x\in \Omega} |\partial_{\alpha}(\cdot)|\right)\text{ is a Banach space.}$$ Then refer to the first part about $C^{k,\gamma}(\Omega)$.