Let $x$ be a point in an irreducible algebraic variety $X$. Is the following equality hold? $$ \mathcal{O}_{\overline{X},x}=\overline{\mathcal{O}_{X,x}} $$ Where $\bar X$ is the normalization of the variety $X$ and $\overline{\mathcal{O}_{X,x}}$ is the integral closure of ${\mathcal{O}_{X,x}}$ in its field of fractions.
2026-03-31 09:22:20.1774948940
Normalization of affine variety
395 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let's consider the affine case: $A$ is an integral domain which is finitely generated as a $k$-algebra, with quotient field $K$. Let $B$ be the integral closure of $A$ in $K$. If we set $X = \operatorname{Spec}A, \overline{X} = \operatorname{Spec}B$, then the inclusion $A \subseteq B$ gives a dominant morphism of varieties $f: \overline{X} \rightarrow X$. This morphism is also closed (hence surjective) with finite fibers.
If $\mathfrak P = \bar x \in \overline{X}$, and $\mathfrak p = x = f(\bar x) = \mathfrak P \cap A$, then your question is whether $B_{\mathfrak P}$ is the integral closure of $A_{\mathfrak p}$ in $K$.
The answer turns out to be yes if and only if $\mathfrak P$ is the only prime of $B$ lying over $\mathfrak p$, i.e. if the preimage $f^{-1}(x)$ contains a single element.
To see this, let $S = A - \mathfrak p$. Since $B$ is the integral closure of $A$ in $K$, $S^{-1}B$ is the integral closure of $S^{-1}A = A_{\mathfrak p}$ in $K$, and we can identify $\operatorname{Spec} S^{-1}B$ with those primes $\mathfrak Q$ of $B$ for which $\mathfrak Q \cap A \subseteq \mathfrak p$. In particular, by incomparability/going up/going down, the maximal ideals of $S^{-1}B$ are those primes of $B$ which lie over $\mathfrak p$.
Now, by the transitivity of localization, $B_{\mathfrak P}$ is the localization of $S^{-1}B$ at the prime $\mathfrak P$.
Thus, $B_{\mathfrak P}$ is the integral closure of of $A_{\mathfrak p}$ if and only if $B_{\mathfrak P} = S^{-1}B$, if and only if $\mathfrak P$ is the only prime of $B$ lying over $\mathfrak p$.
If you are just sticking to closed points (maximal ideals), you can probably simplify this argument.
And by covering a general irreducible variety $X$ with affine open sets $U$, using the fact that $f^{-1}(U)$ corresponds to the integral closure of $U$, you can reduce to the affine case to say the same thing about nonaffine varieties.