Null sum of vectors over the field of two elements

101 Views Asked by At

I'm dealing with the test of the International Mathematics Competition for University Students, 2011, and I've had a lot of difficulties, so I hope someone could help me to discuss the questions. I've posted the question 2 at here.

The question 5 says:

Let be $n$ a positive integer and $V$ a vector space with dimension $2n-1$ over the field of two elements. Prove that for any arbitrary vectors $v_1,v_2,\dots,v_{4n-1}$, there is a sequence $1\leq i_1\lt i_2\lt \dots \lt i_{2n}\leq 4n-1$ of indexs such that $v_{i_1}+v_{i_2}+\dots+v_{i_{2n}}=0$.

Well, my little attempts was these:

Consider all the sets linearly independent (LI) of those vectors. Once the sets have finite amount, we have some that has the maximum amount of vectors. Supose that are $\{v_1,v_2,\dots, v_k\}$.

As the dimension of $V$ is $2n-1$, we have $k\leq 2n-1$.

Take $v_1+v_2+\dots+v_{4k-1}$. We have that this sum can be writed as a linear combination of $\{v_1,v_2,\dots, v_k\}$.

But we are on binary system and the linear combinations are simple sums. In fact, the constants are only $0$ and $1$. So, we can write $v_1+v_2+\dots+v_{4k-1}$ as a sum of vectors from $\{v_1,v_2,\dots, v_k\}$, with $d$ terms ($d\leq k\leq 2n-1$).

From that equality, we cancel these $d$ vectors in both sides and get a sum of $4n-1-d\geq 2n$ vectors that is null. Is it correct?

Well, we can take the same way and get other smaller sums $=0$. But I cannot prove that there's a null sum of EXACTLY $2n$ vectors.

Thanks very much for help.

Important Edit (October, 04)

I've found a document with these solutions and I'm studying them. These are the documents: http://www.imc-math.org.uk/imc2011/imc2011-day2-solutions.pdf and http://www.imc-math.org.uk/imc2011/imc2011-day1-solutions.pdf.

Edited October, 11

I need a help at the answer of the document above in that part: Problem 5 - Answer

So, I couldn't understand very well because $\tilde{v_i}$ or sets, not vector as I'm familiarized. But I think I can get this; however, I couldn't understand as I pass from here to

"Then, $v_1+v_2,v_3+v_4,\cdots, v_{2d-1}+v_{2d}$ is a basis of $V$".

Could someone explain better or indicate some material? Thank you very much.