While observing the typical number representation theory I came up with this weird observation. While we represent the higher order of exponents towards the right side of the number line representing numbers we follow opposite, i.e., higher order exponents are written towards the left side, i.e., we flow from left to right. Why is this? Is there a scientific explanation? e.g., You know 123 is 3*10^0 + 2*10^1 + 1*10^2. In number line 10^2 is right to 10^1 and 10^1 right to 10^0. So if we follow number line the representation could be 321 to represent 123, but we do represent in the opposite way. Why is this?
2026-02-23 11:04:51.1771844691
Number Line and Number Representation
190 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in NUMBER-LINE
- Do right-to-left readers also reverse mathematical concepts like number line?
- While working with negative slopes, how to decide which slope is greater?
- Difference between negative and positive temperatures written as absolute value or the negative integer?
- Number Line and Number Representation
- Convert numbers between 0 and infinity to numbers between 0.0 and 1.0
- Would a drawing of the rationals on a number line create the appearance of a line, nothing, or both?
- Why left side is negative on Number line?
- Finding a value on a number line?
- Why does floating point numbers have uneven spacing on the number line?
- Irrational numbers on the number line
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Interesting question. I don't think the answer is, "because in English we write from left to right", because our value of 123 could be written as 321, and this 321 could be considered "left-to-right" if we defined 321 as 3*10^0 + 2*10^1 + 1*10^2.
Another example could be the number 14.67 = 0.07 + 0.6 + 4 + 10. But there's nothing saying we couldn't instead define from the outset 76.41 = 0.07 + 0.6 + 4 + 10.
I think the answer to this question is: it's arbitrary how we define how numbers are written, and your way would technically work just as well as the common way. However, people have stuck with what was first done (if it ain't broke, don't fix it) and it's easier if everyone sticks to the same convention, even if your way is equally valid.
Furthermore, if people commonly used both ways then for example, I could see how kids might get confused or even give up learning long division the two ways, which would be counter-productive.