What is the number of relations on a n element set that are antisymmetric and not irreflexive? I have tried doing this as fallows- no of antisymmetric relations having atleast one self pair[like (x,x)]=3^((n^2-n)/2){nC1+nC2+.......+nCn}=3^((n^2-n)/2)(2^n-1). Is it correct?
2026-03-29 20:31:40.1774816300
number of antisymmetric and not irreflexive relations
758 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ELEMENTARY-SET-THEORY
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Composition of functions - properties
- Existence of a denumerble partition.
- Why is surjectivity defined using $\exists$ rather than $\exists !$
- Show that $\omega^2+1$ is a prime number.
- A Convention of Set Builder Notation
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- Problem with Cartesian product and dimension for beginners
- Proof that a pair is injective and surjective
- Value of infinite product
Related Questions in RELATIONS
- How are these definitions of continuous relations equivalent?
- Is a relation on which every element is related with itself alone transitive?
- Relation power composition
- Order relation proof
- Order relation proof ...
- How to identify if a given Hasse diagram is a lattice
- Is the relation < a strict total order?
- Is there a name for this property on a binary relation?
- Finding all reflexive binary relations of a set
- Showing that a relation is reflexive, symmetric and transitive
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Since any relation on a set $A$ to itself can be represented by a Boolean matrix. Thus each relation corresponds to a $n \times n$ matrix (call it $M$).
For anti-symmetric relation you need the following: Let $i \neq j$ and let $m_{ij}$ be the $ij^{\text{th}}$ entry of $M$. Then
With this in mind let us consider the pair of entries $(m_{ij}, m_{ji})$. For anti-symmetry these pairs could only be of the form $(1,0), (0,1)$ or $(0,0)$.
Number of such pairs (non-diagonal entry pairs) are $\dfrac{n^2-n}{2}$. Thus the number of matrices $M$ with such pairs are $3^{\frac{n^2-n}{2}}$. Now for antisymmtery the $n$ diagonal entries can be chosen $2^n$ ways (either $0$ or $1$). $$ \text{Thus the number of anti-symmteric relations is } 3^{\frac{n^2-n}{2}} \cdot 2^{n}. $$
For irreflexivity you require that at least one diagonal element of $M$ should be $1$. So we count for the opposite case when all diagonal entries are $0$. With the method illustrated above: the number of anti-symmteric relations with all diagonal entires zero (i.e. the relations which ARE irreflexive) is $3^{\frac{n^2-n}{2}}$.
Thus the number of anti-symmetric relations that are NOT irreflexive is $$ 3^{\frac{n^2-n}{2}} \cdot 2^{n} - 3^{\frac{n^2-n}{2}} = 3^{\frac{n^2-n}{2}}(2^n-1). $$
So your answer is correct!!.