Would this be the correct approach to finding $n$ if I want the sample mean to be less than $5.7$ with a probability of $95\%$? ( Given $X \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu=6,\,\sigma^{2}=0.3^{2})$ )
$Pr(\bar{X}<5.7)=0.95$
$Pr\left(z<\frac{5.7-6}{0.3/\sqrt{n}}\right)=0.95$
$\frac{5.7-6}{0.3/\sqrt{n}}=1.65$
Thank you.
I think you have it backwards. If the population mean is $\mu = 6,$ then it will be difficult for the mean of a large-ish sample to be less than $5.7.$ In your formulation it will require a negative z-value to match the negative quantity $\frac{5.7-6}{0.3/\sqrt{n}}.$
If you want the sample mean of $n$ observations to be more than 5.7 about 95% of the time, then you have $-1.645 = \frac{5.7-6}{0.3/\sqrt{n}}.$ And, solving for $n$ we get $n \approx 1.645^2 = 2.7055,$ so $n =3$ observations should suffice.
Note: In case you are still having trouble with the intuition of this, here is a simulation in R statistical software with $m = 10^6$ samples of size $n,$ one sample of size $n = 3$ on each row of the matrix. Of the one million sample averages
asimulated in this way, almost 96% exceeded $5.7.$ (Being slightly fussier about the simulation result, the expected proportion of averages exceeding $5.7$ is about $0.95807 \pm 0.00040.$)In the figure below the histogram shows the simulated sample means, the curve is the density function of $\mathsf{Norm}(\mu=6, \sigma = .3/\sqrt{3}),$ and the area under the density curve to the right of the vertical dotted line is about 0.958.