There are numbers which are square roots of negative numbers and they're are those which are logarithms of negative numbers(both are complex numbers).
Are there any numbers whose moduli are negative? I mean, $|x|<0$
If yes, what are they?
If no, why?
In the complex numbers, no. $|z|$ is defined to be $\sqrt{z*\overline z}$ which is non negative as $z\overline z = \Re(z)^2 + \Im(z)^2$ is always non-negative real.
I suspect you are asking as we extended the reals to the complex (depending upon your philsophy) by allowing square roots of negatives which as a consequence allowed for logarithms of negative numbers, you are asking if we can create another number system that will allow $|z| < 0$.
It's hard for me to imagine how or why we would do so. There are no numbers that "want to exist but can't" because if they existed there modulus would have to be negative. And as modulus was defined to be non-neg real, it's hard to imagine in what sense we'd define another meaning for it that satisfy any condition associated with it. Primarily the condition that the modulus represents the quantitative measure of the absolute non-negative size of something.
=====
Okay, more.
In the reals $|x|$ is defined as $|x| = x$ if $x \ge 0$ and $|x| = -x$ if $x < 0$.
In extending to the complex numbers we could have kept that definition as close as possible by saying $|a+ib| = a+ib$ if $a \ge 0$ and $|a+ib| = -a-ib$ if $a < 0$. Admittedly we wouldn't ever have $|z| < 0$ but we would have $|z| \not \ge 0$. We could define, god knows why we'd want to but we could, $|a+ib| = a+b$ and the we could have $|z| < 0$.
So we don't we? Why instead to we replace the simple $|x| = \pm x$ with the scary looking $|a+bi| = \sqrt{(a+bi)(a-bi)} = \sqrt{a^2 + b^2}$?
Well, BECAUSE $|a+bi|= \sqrt{a^2 + b^2}$ IS greater than or equal to $0$. That $|z| \ge 0$ is a requirement of the definition of anything that we wish to call a "modulus".
Y2H in his/her answer lists some of the requirements for what something we call a "modulus" must obey. Why must we obey it to call it a modulus? Because if we didn't there wouldn't be any meaning to the word "modulus".
(Why is an elephant large, gray and wrinkly? Because if it were small, white and smooth it would be an aspirin.)
The very first requirement is ... that the "modulus" is real, and non-negative.
The modulus is essentially the "size" of a number. And size is positive value (or zero if and only if the number is zero). That's just.... axiomatic.
There are other conditions. By definition:
In an algebra, If $a,b \in F$, a field, $|a|$ is called the modulus, we must have:
i)$|a| \in \mathbb R; |a| \ge 0$.
ii) $|a| = 0$ if and only if $a$ is the multiplicative identity of $F$.
iii) $|ab| = |a||b|$
iv) $|a+b| \le |a| + |b|$
In vector spaces, $|x|$ is a norm and we must have (by definition) where $V,W$ are vectors in a vector space and $a$ is an element of a field:
i) $|V| \ge 0; |V| \in \mathbb R$
ii) $|V| = 0 \iff V = 0$
iii) $|aV| = |a||V|$ where $|a|$ is a modulus of $a$.
iv) $|V + W| \le |V| + |W|$.