Omar Khayyam's method of solving cubics compared to 16th century Italian

393 Views Asked by At

Just wondering if anyone can clarify these two ways of solving cubics. Theres not many examples online which I can find.

Q1. Give Omar Khayyam’s geometrical solution to the cubic equation $x^3 + 64x = 384.$ Check that the geometric solution is correct using modern methods.

Q2. Then Using the formula established by the 16th-century Italian method, find a solution to the cubic equation $ x^3 + 63x = 316.$

For Q1 I know that we transform this into finding the intersection of a parabola and a hyperbola, however I'm having difficulty applying this formula to an actual example.

I'd appreciate any guidance or examples which can be given

1

There are 1 best solutions below

3
On

First: Omar Khayyam's method. Let's solve: $$x^3+64x=384$$ We need to turn our equation into something of the form: $$\left(\frac{x^2}{c}\right)^2=x(d-x)$$ With $c$ and $d$ constants. Then we can find the intersection of: $$y^2=x(d-x)$$ $$y=\frac1cx^2$$ The $x$-coordinate of the intersection will be a solution to our equation. Ok, so let's do it: \begin{align} x^3+64x&=384\\ x^3&=384-64x\\ \frac{x^3}{64}&=6-x\\ \frac{x^4}{64}&=x(6-x)\\ \left(\frac{x^2}{8}\right)^2&=x(6-x) \end{align} So, we need to find the intersection of: $$y=\frac18x^2$$ and: $$y^2=x(6-x)$$

Now for Cardano's (The Italian Mathematician) Formula. We have: $$x^3+63x=316$$ $$x^3+63x-316=0$$ Cardano's formula tells us that the equation: $$x^3+px+q$$ has the solutions: $$x=\sqrt[3]{-\frac q2+\sqrt{\frac{q^2}4+\frac{p^3}{27}}}+\sqrt[3]{-\frac q2-\sqrt{\frac{q^2}4+\frac{p^3}{27}}}$$ So filling it all in gives: $$x=\sqrt[3]{\frac {316}2+\sqrt{\frac{316^2}4+\frac{63^3}{27}}}+\sqrt[3]{\frac {316}2-\sqrt{\frac{316^2}4+\frac{63^3}{27}}}$$