Let $G$ be a graph. If $v_i$ (resp. $v_iv_j$) is a cut vertex (resp. a bridge) of $G$, what can you say about its adjacency matrix $A(G)$?
2026-04-23 16:29:32.1776961772
On Adjacency Matrix of a Graph with a Cut Vertex and a Bridge
863 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMBINATORICS
- Using only the digits 2,3,9, how many six-digit numbers can be formed which are divisible by 6?
- The function $f(x)=$ ${b^mx^m}\over(1-bx)^{m+1}$ is a generating function of the sequence $\{a_n\}$. Find the coefficient of $x^n$
- Name of Theorem for Coloring of $\{1, \dots, n\}$
- Hard combinatorial identity: $\sum_{l=0}^p(-1)^l\binom{2l}{l}\binom{k}{p-l}\binom{2k+2l-2p}{k+l-p}^{-1}=4^p\binom{k-1}{p}\binom{2k}{k}^{-1}$
- Algebraic step including finite sum and binomial coefficient
- nth letter of lexicographically ordered substrings
- Count of possible money splits
- Covering vector space over finite field by subspaces
- A certain partition of 28
- Counting argument proof or inductive proof of $F_1 {n \choose1}+...+F_n {n \choose n} = F_{2n}$ where $F_i$ are Fibonacci
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in GRAPH-THEORY
- characterisation of $2$-connected graphs with no even cycles
- Explanation for the static degree sort algorithm of Deo et al.
- A certain partition of 28
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Is it true that if a graph is bipartite iff it is class 1 (edge-coloring)?
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- Triangle-free graph where every pair of nonadjacent vertices has exactly two common neighbors
- Inequality on degrees implies perfect matching
- Proving that no two teams in a tournament win same number of games
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
When you have a graph with two components, you can treat each component as its own graph in terms of the adjacency matrix. One of the most basic results is that the spectrum of $G$ is the spectrum of each of its components. So if I have two disconnected instances $C_{3}$ for my graph, then my eigenvalues are $2$ with multiplicity two, and $-1$ with multiplicity four.
Edit to expand some on the spectrum:
Spectra vary upon graphs, so that factors into it. Immediately in the characteristic polynomial, we note that the edge count and triangle count are encoded. We can get this by looking at the cofactors. So the coefficient of $\lambda^{n-2}$ is increased by $1$, as $c_{2} = -|E|$ of the graph. Similarly, we note that $c_{3}$, the coefficient of $\lambda^{n-3} = -2C_{3}$, twice the number of triangles in the graph. That won't change since the edge removed is a cut edge.
We also look at our trace-eigenvalue identity. So $\sum_{i=1}^{n} \lambda_{i} = tr(A) = 0$ on a simple graph. Squaring the adjacency matrix gives the diagonal entries as counting the edges. So $\sum_{i=1}^{n} \lambda_{i}^{2} = tr(A^{2}) = 2E$, and $\sum_{i=1}^{n} \lambda_{i}^{3} = tr(A^{3}) = 6C_{3}$. (I am happy to provide more proof if desired). So we see removing a cut edge will change $tr(A^{2})$ but not $tr(A^{3})$.
Another nice example to look at is the star graph on $n$ vertices. Its spectrum is $\pm \sqrt{n-1}$, each with multiplicity one; and $0$ with multiplicity $n-2$. Interestingly enough, $S_{n} - e$, for some $e \in E(S_{n})$ gives us the characteristic polynomial for $S_{n-1}$.
Removing an edge won't change whether or not the graph is bipartite, so the spectrum will still be symmetric to the origin. This means that $\lambda_{i} = -\lambda_{n-i}$. If $G$ is connected, we only have to check that $\lambda_{1} = -\lambda_{n}$ to determine if $G$ is bipartite. However, if $G$ is not connected (by removal of a cut edge), we have to check the entire spectrum. So this quickly goes from a $\Theta(1)$ operation (given the spectrum) to a $\Theta(n)$ operation.
There are textbooks on spectral graph theory; and given the lack of focus of the question, you can see that it's hard to really focus down. These properties constitute probably 10 pages in the textbook I own on the subject.