I have a question concerning the Bourbaki's book on integration.
Whenever I find them referenced (in answers on this site as well), it looks like they aged more than volumes of the same series on other topics. Also, it looks like they were criticised from the outset (e.g. see Halmos' comment from page 11 of this chapter).
Thus, the questions:
why?
Is there a problem in the entire approach to the topic?
What was problematic in it?How sensible is to read them right now, beyond historical purposes?
What should somebody have in mind when reading them?
How shoud somebody read them?
Given the answer to question (1), what should be taken, and what should be dismissed?
Thank you as always for any feedback.
PS: Moreover, right now, are there serious problems with the terminology? Is it outdated?