Let ($M$, $\mu$) be a measure space. Consider the operator $T:L^{2}(M, \mu)\to L^{2}(M, \mu)$ with $$Tf(x)=\int_{M}{k(x, y)f(y)d\mu},$$ where $k(x, y)\geq 0$ and $k(x, y)=k(y, x)$ satisfying $$k(x, y)\leq h_{1}(x, y)+h_{2}(x, y)$$ where $h_{i}(x, y)=h_{i}(y, x)$ and $h_{i}(x, y)\geq 0$. Suppose that for the operator $H_{i}:L^{2}(M, \mu)\to L^{2}(M, \mu)$ with $$H_{i}f(x)=\int_{M}{h_{i}(x, y)f(y)d\mu},$$ we have $$||H_{1}||_{2\to 2}\leq \lambda_{1}$$ and $$||H_{2}||_{2\to 2}\leq \lambda_{2}.$$ Does it follow that $$||T||_{2\to 2}\leq C(\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2})?$$ Thanks in advance!
2026-04-12 15:58:39.1776009519
Operatornorm bound by splitting operator
40 Views Asked by user525192 https://math.techqa.club/user/user525192/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in OPERATOR-THEORY
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Confusion about relationship between operator $K$-theory and topological $K$-theory
- Definition of matrix valued smooth function
- hyponormal operators
- a positive matrix of operators
- If $S=(S_1,S_2)$ hyponormal, why $S_1$ and $S_2$ are hyponormal?
- Closed kernel of a operator.
- Why is $\lambda\mapsto(\lambda\textbf{1}-T)^{-1}$ analytic on $\rho(T)$?
- Show that a sequence of operators converges strongly to $I$ but not by norm.
- Is the dot product a symmetric or anti-symmetric operator?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You can even take $C = 1$ in this case.
First, I claim that $\|T\| = \sup\{\|Tf\|: \|f\| = 1, f \geq 0\}$. This is straightforward to see since by using the fact that $k$ is a non-negative kernel, we get that for $f \in L^2(M,\mu)$, $|Tf(x)| \leq T(|f|)(x)$ and $\||f|\| = \|f\|$. In particular, the same is true for $H_1,H_2$ and $H_1 + H_2$ also.
So suppose $\|f\| = 1$ and $f \geq 0$. Then \begin{align*} \|Tf\|^2 =& \int_M \bigg( \int_M k(x,y)f(y) \mu(dy) \bigg)^2 \mu(dx)\\ \leq& \int_M \bigg( \int_M h_1(x,y)f(y) + h_2(x,y)f(y) \mu(dy) \bigg)^2 \mu(dx) \\ =& \int_M (H_1f(x) + H_2f(x))^2 \mu(dx) \\=& \|H_1f + H_2f\|^2 \end{align*} where I use the fact that we can take $f$ non-negative to pass to the second line. Hence, by the triangle inequality, we can conclude that $\|Tf\| \leq \|H_1f\| + \|H_2f\|$ and hence that $\|T\| \leq \|H_1\| + \|H_2\|$ as desired.