A smooth closed curve C is said to be convex if it lies wholly to one side of each tangent . Show that for the triangle of minimum area circumscribed about C that each side is tangent to C at its midpoint.
2026-04-09 05:25:30.1775712330
Optimisation Problem about convex curve
86 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CALCULUS
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- How can I prove that $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\ln(1+\cos(\alpha)\cos(x))}{\cos(x)}dx=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\pi^2}{4}-\alpha^2\right)$?
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- If $f ◦f$ is differentiable, then $f ◦f ◦f$ is differentiable
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Number of roots of the e
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- How to prove $\frac 10 \notin \mathbb R $
- Proving that: $||x|^{s/2}-|y|^{s/2}|\le 2|x-y|^{s/2}$
Related Questions in ANALYSIS
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Show that $d:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\rightarrow[0,\infty[$ is a metric on $\mathbb{C}$.
- conformal mapping and rational function
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- How to prove that $E_P(\frac{dQ}{dP}|\mathcal{G})$ is not equal to $0$
- Integral of ratio of polynomial
Related Questions in PROBLEM-SOLVING
- How do you prevent being lead astray when you're working on a problem that takes months/years?
- How to prove the inequality $\frac{1}{n}+\frac{1}{n+1}+\cdots+\frac{1}{2n-1}\geq \log (2)$?
- How to solve higher order polynomial equations?
- Methods in finding invariant subspaces?
- Question about the roots of a complex polynomial
- Using a counting argument to prove some equalities? (Problem Solving)
- (Problem Solving) Proving $\sum_{k=0}^{n}(-1)^k\binom{n}{k}\frac{1}{k+m+1}=\sum_{k=0}^{m}(-1)^k\binom{m}{k}\frac{1}{k+n+1}$
- (Problem Solving) Proving $|x|^p +|y|^p \geq |x+y|^p$
- Each vertex of the square has a value which is randomly chosen from a set.
- Fill in the blanks
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
A geometric lemma first: Let $P$ be a point in the interior of angle $CAB$, and let $XPY$ be a line segment with $X$ on ray $AB$ and $Y$ on ray $AC$, and further suppose $P$ bisects the segment $XY$. Then any other triangle formed by passing a line through $P$ and intersecting the line with the sides of angle $CAB$ has larger area than the area of triangle $AXY.$ This lemma is fairly easy to show, though I could not locate a reference to it. A proof can be based on the triangles formed by two nearby chords through $P$ and the formula $(1/2)uv\sin\theta$ for the area of a triangle; I can include some details if needed.
Now to apply this to the case at hand. Assume given an angle at $A$ for which the closed curve $\gamma$ is tangent to the sides of angle $A$ at points $M$ and $N$. We wish to find where on the rest of $\gamma$ to place the third vertex. If we suppose we have a minimal area triangle superscribed about $\gamma,$ and this triangle cuts the ray $AM$ at $B$, and ray $AN$ at $C$, our claim is that the point $P$ at which the curve $\gamma$ is tangent to segment $BC$ must bisect that segment. For assume not. Then a copy of line $BC$ can be rolled along $\gamma$ in such a way that it ends up tangent to $\gamma$ at a point $Q$, and this new tangent line at $Q$ is cut by the sides of angle $A$ into a segment such that $Q$ now bisects this segment. It is clear that $Q$ is interior to the triangle $ABC$. By the above geometric fact, we may now rotate the line through $Q$ about $Q$, which increases its length, until it is parallel to side $BC$. But then clearly the area formed by the sides of the angle $A$ and the tangent line through $Q$ is less than the area of triangle $ABC$, which was supposed to be minimal.
The same argument may be applied to the other sides, so that indeed all three sides of the minimal triangle are bisected by the contact points of $\gamma.$