I used Numerov's method to solve the following ODE $$\ddot{y}+\omega^2(t)y=0$$ where $\omega (t)$ is a $\tanh$ function. However, when I looked at the order of accuracy of the method (I let $\omega(t)$ be a constant) by halving the step size. The error only halved instead of reduced by a factor of $2^4$ as it supposed to be since Numerov's method is a fourth order method. I also tried letting $\omega(t)$ be the $\tanh$ function I used then calculate the order of accuracy using $p=\log_2\left(\frac{y(h)-y(0.5h)}{y(0.5h)-y(0.25h)}\right)$ where $h$ is the step size, it gives $ p=1 $. What is the reason for this disagreement?
2026-04-29 21:46:11.1777499171
Order of accuracy of Numerov's method
353 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ORDINARY-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- The Runge-Kutta method for a system of equations
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Stability of system of ordinary nonlinear differential equations
- Maximal interval of existence of the IVP
- Power series solution of $y''+e^xy' - y=0$
- Change of variables in a differential equation
- Dimension of solution space of homogeneous differential equation, proof
- Solve the initial value problem $x^2y'+y(x-y)=0$
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
Related Questions in NUMERICAL-METHODS
- The Runge-Kutta method for a system of equations
- How to solve the exponential equation $e^{a+bx}+e^{c+dx}=1$?
- Is the calculated solution, if it exists, unique?
- Modified conjugate gradient method to minimise quadratic functional restricted to positive solutions
- Minimum of the 2-norm
- Is method of exhaustion the same as numerical integration?
- Prove that Newton's Method is invariant under invertible linear transformations
- Initial Value Problem into Euler and Runge-Kutta scheme
- What are the possible ways to write an equation in $x=\phi(x)$ form for Iteration method?
- Numerical solution for a two dimensional third order nonlinear differential equation
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
For $\ddot y(t)+\tanh^2(t)y(t)=0$ one finds that the solution close to zero has a power series expansion $y(t)=\sum c_kt^k$ that starts with $$ [2c_2+6c_3t+12c_4t^2+20c_5t^3+...]+[t^2+\tfrac23t^4+...][c_0+a_1t+c_2t^2+...]=0\\ c_2=0\\c_3=0\\12c_4=-c_0\\20c_5=-c_1\\...\\ \implies y(t)=\bigl[1-\tfrac12t^4\pm...\bigr]y_0+\bigl[1-\tfrac1{20}t^4\pm...\bigr]t\dot y_0. $$ This means that the error in setting $y(Δt)\approx y_1=y(0)+\dot y(0)Δt+\frac12\ddot y(0)Δt^2$ is not the generally expected $O(Δt^3)$ but for this case $O(Δt^4)$.
The global error $e(t_k)=y_k-y(t_k)$ of the Numerov method has two main contributions, the general one from the discretization error and secondly the error in the first step. Their leading terms are $$e(t)=a(t)Δt^p+b(t)Δt^4$$ where in the case $p<4$ the functions $a,b$ satisfy the differential equations \begin{align} \ddot a(t)+\tanh^2(t)a(t)&=0,&~~a(0)&=0,~~a(Δt)Δt^{p+1}=y_1-y(Δt)+O(Δt^{p+2})\\ \ddot b(t)+\tanh^2(t)b(t)&=-r_6(t),&~~b(0)&=0,~~\dot b(0)=0 \end{align} The function $$ r_6(t)Δt^6+...=y(t+Δt)-2y(t)+y(t-Δt)-\frac1{12}[f(t+Δt,..)+10f(t,..)+f(t-Δt,..)]Δt^2 $$ is the local truncation error of the exact solution. As $a$ has a power series expansion like $y$, one finds that $a(Δt)Δt^3=[1-\frac1{20}Δt^4\pm\dots]Δt^4\dot a(0)=-\frac1{12}y(0)Δt^4$ so that in leading order and for small $t$ one has $a(t)=-\frac1{12}y(0)\cdot t$ and the dominant error term is $a(t)Δt^3$.
In conclusion, with a correct implementation of the method you should find an empirical error order $3$ for the given problem with the quadratic first step. In general, if the third derivative at zero is non-zero, that method assembly should only give global error order $2$.
To remove any visible influence of the error in the first term one needs to compute $y_1$ with an order 4 method or better, as then also $p=4$, so that both error components have the same power.