I'm just getting into the hyperreals and infinitesimals and I would like to understand how one can determine when e is <, = or > g (where e and g are elements of the the infinitesimals). How does one order this field?
2026-03-25 13:53:02.1774446782
Ordering the hyperreals and infinitesimals
137 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in NONSTANDARD-ANALYSIS
- Is this result related to the Taylor series?
- Multiplication property of equality for infinitesimals
- Textbook recommendation for non-standard analysis
- Applying ultrapower construction to the field $\mathbb {Q} $ of rationals
- Physical Calculator with Hyperreals and Multiple Dimensions?
- Epsilon-Delta Continuity in Hyperreals
- Is $\approx$ actually an entourage?
- Nonstandard Extension of the Characteristic Function
- How are infinite sums in nonstandard analysis defined?
- Searching for an example of a theorem wich is "easy" to prove in a classical way but way more difficult in the setting of non-standard analysis.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The ordering of a$^1$ hyperreal field is part of its algebraic structure: we say $a<b$ iff $b-a$ has a square root (and this works for all $a,b$ in the field). So as soon as you know the algebraic structure, you know the ordering.
More interestingly, your question could also be asked in terms of representations, analogously to decimal representations of real numbers: is there an analogue of decimal representation for hyperreals such that comparing representations is "reasonably simple"?
Unfortunately, the answer to this question is no: in a precise sense, hyperreal fields are "less explicitly describable" than $\mathbb{R}$ itself. For example, in the usual construction of a hyperreal field $H$ via an ultrapower over $\mathbb{N}$ our hyperreals are equivalence classes of sequences of real numbers, and each sequence in a given class can be thought of as a "name" for that class. Now so far this is reminiscent of the definition of reals as equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences; however, it turns out that however we build this ultrapower there will be no good way to either pick canonical representations of hyperreals or to compare two representations in general.
In fact, it's consistent with ZF (= set theory without the axiom of choice) that no hyperreal fields exist at all. This means that we can never have too concrete a representation system for a given hyperreal field, since otherwise we could in ZF alone reconstruct that field from that representation system.
$^1$Per Mark S.'s comment above, there isn't a single hyperreal field; roughly speaking, a hyperreal field is any field which contains $\mathbb{R}$, is sufficiently rich, and has an appropriate transfer principle.