What can be the example of an ordering with one minimal element, but without the smallest element? Can this be an example: Proper subset relation defined on the set {{1}, {1,2}}.
2026-04-01 12:46:24.1775047584
On
Ordering with one minimal element, but without the smallest element
2.3k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
There are 2 best solutions below
9
On
If $P$ is a finite partial order, and $p\in P$, there is always a minimal element $q\le p$. Thus, if a finite partial order has exactly one minimal element, that element is automatically the smallest element of the partial order. Thus, if you want a partial order with exactly one minimal element and no smallest element, you’ll need an infinite partial order. Here’s the Hasse diagram of one that works:
° *
|
*
|
*
|
·
·
·
The element $\circ$ in the upper left is the unique minimal element, and there is clearly no smallest element. A slightly more interesting example:
*
/ |
° *
|
*
|
·
·
·
You will need a partially, not totally ordered, set to get an example. You may take a (silly) example like: $$\{(0,y)\in {\Bbb R}^2: 0<y<1\} \cup \{(1,y)\in {\Bbb R}^2: 0\leq y<1\}$$ with the partial ordering $(x,y) \prec (x',y')$ iff $x=x'$ and $y\leq y'$. Then $(1,0)$ is a minimal element but not a smallest element (because it is not related to the elements with $x=0$) and there are no other minimal elements.