Let $S$ be a differentiable surface, is it possible to understand if $S$ is orientable from its metric $g$?
2026-03-29 20:34:01.1774816441
Orientability of a differentiable surface knowing the metric
191 Views Asked by user333046 https://math.techqa.club/user/user333046/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in METRIC-SPACES
- Show that $d:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\rightarrow[0,\infty[$ is a metric on $\mathbb{C}$.
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Lemma 1.8.2 - Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory
- Closure and Subsets of Normed Vector Spaces
- Is the following set open/closed/compact in the metric space?
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
- continuous surjective function from $n$-sphere to unit interval
- Show that $f$ with $f(\overline{x})=0$ is continuous for every $\overline{x}\in[0,1]$.
- Help in understanding proof of Heine-Borel Theorem from Simmons
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in SURFACES
- Surface by revolution
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Hyperplane line bundle really defined by some hyperplane
- 2D closed surface such that there's always a straight line to a point?
- parametrized surface are isometric if all corresponding curves have same length
- Klein bottle and torus in mod $p$ homology
- How can I prove that the restricted parametrization of a surface in $\mathbb{R}^{3}$ ia a diffeomorphism?
- A diffeomorphism between a cylinder and a one-sheeted hyperboloid
- Involution of the 3 and 4-holed torus and its effects on some knots and links
Related Questions in NON-ORIENTABLE-SURFACES
- When you divide the real projective plane into two subsets, does it always have exactly one non-orientable component?
- Does Day and Night on a Klein bottle have a steady state?
- Example of a non-orientable 3-manifold
- Is there a way to prove algebraically that a Möbius strip is non-orientable?
- What is the 'center circle' of a Mobius Band?
- Criterion for being in a non-orientable 3 manifold?
- Existence af a Frame on the Klein Bottle
- Immersion of non-orientable manifold in a small orientable one
- Paradromic rings and Mobius strip
- How to arrive at an equation of a Roman surface from three points (a triangle)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The way you posed the question doesn't really make sense -- to "know the metric," you first have to know what the surface is, because the metric is a choice of inner product on each tangent plane of the surface. If you know the surface, then you can determine whether it's orientable or not without reference to a metric.
But it is possible in some circumstances to draw conclusions about orientability based on partial knowledge of the metric, such as knowing that its curvature is positive or negative everywhere. If the definition of surface you're working with is a certain kind of subset of $\mathbb R^3$, then there is a little bit that can be said. If $S$ is a compact surface embedded in $\mathbb R^3$, then it is orientable regardless of what kind of metric it has. If it's not compact, then it could have negative curvature, zero curvature, or mixed positive and negative curvatures and still be either orientable or not.
However, here's one theorem that might be useful.
Theorem. A smooth surface in $\mathbb R^3$ with everywhere positive Gaussian curvature is orientable.
Proof. The fact that the Gaussian curvature is positive everywhere means that the principal curvatures are always nonzero and have the same sign. Their sign depends on a choice of unit normal; replacing the normal by its opposite causes both of the principal curvatures to change sign. Thus we can always choose the unit normal that makes the principal curvatures positive, and this yields a global smooth unit normal field and thus an orientation. $\square$
For abstract Riemannian manifolds in arbitrary dimensions, I know of one interesting global result that relates curvature and orientability:
Synge's Theorem. Suppose $M$ is a compact, connected Riemannian manifold with strictly positive sectional curvature.
There's a proof in my book Introduction to Riemannian Manifolds, 2nd ed.