How euclid's 5th postulate transforms in non euclidean geometry? How to visualize that there are more than one lines that are parallel to the point?
2026-03-26 04:50:15.1774500615
Parallel postulate of euclid
44 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in NONEUCLIDEAN-GEOMETRY
- Sharing endpoint at infinity
- Why don't we have many non euclidean geometries out there?
- Construction of Parallel Lines in Absolute Geometry
- Why is the mirror descent considered a "non-Euclidean" algorithm?
- How does a polar triangle characterize/ define a hyperbolic ellipse?
- Why is the hyperbolic plane homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^2$, whilst the 2-sphere isn't?
- Is Non-Euclidean geometry really "Non"?
- Isometries on the Hyperbolic Plane
- Relation between curvature on surface, curvature of surface in space, and curvature of space
- Use scale in projection to solve for curvature
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
To answer your first question, when the parallel postulate is no longer assumed to be true, other geometries such as hyperbolic and ecliptic geometry are created. In hyperbolic geometry, there are infinitely many intersecting lines that do not intersect, but in ecliptic geometry, every line eventually intersects.
What I think is the most important question is your second question,
Playfair's axiom which is a corollary of the parallel postulate says "given a line and a point not on it (the line), then there is only one line that passes through the point AND is parallel to the line", which directly contradicts your statement.
When the original form of Euclid's parallel postulate states that if the angle between two straight lines ($A$ and $B$) and an intersecting line ($C$) is less than $90º$, then those two lines will meet. This implies that when $A$ and $B$ are perpendicular to $C$, then $A$ and $B$ are parallel. We finally get to the corollary by placing the point at the intersection of $A$ or $B$ and $C$, so when the other intersection is moved on the other line, there is only one parallel line passing through it.
I hope this cleared some misconceptions about the exact definitions of the parallel postulate, and what happens in alternate geometries when the parallel postulate is not true.